The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement.
"Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes remain lower than those in neighboring towns. Moreover, Clearview's mayor promises many new programs to improve schools, streets, and public services. And best of all, retirees in Clearview can also expect excellent health care as they grow older, since the number of physicians in the area is far greater than the national average."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The author of the argument purportedly highlights that countryside is the best place for retires in the case of health care because it has many advantages such as tranquility, climate and so forth. However, the premises upon which he puts his claim are fallacious. For the support of which, more critical, yet ignored question need to be addressed.
First, the author contends that it should be a top choice because of no pollution and attractive landscape. However, it does not lend credence to the argument since, a question that might arise is whether vast majorities of retires opt for a place in countryside. One point that should be consider is that the author does not provide any information or statistics about retires who prefer to choose clear views. In fact, there is possibility that most of them select second job and start new career after retirement. It is also important to say that people's taste differ from each other perhaps retires prefer not to live in countryside because of paucity of facilities, which will make living harder.
The author also asserts that houses' costs have decreased during past years and people pay lower taxes compare to other counties. Although it might seems tenable at face, it has some defects, since you can always ask this question if expenses and taxes will remain constant without any fluctuation. One of the main, if not the only, problem with the premise is that there is no guarantee to ensure retires that expenses and houses' costs do not increase drastically in current years. Indeed, what if the city face economic recession or inflation after those years. Alongside that, evidences shown that taxes have raised day in day out and it will not diminish in future time.
Finally, as set forth by the author the mayor ensure people to develop everything such as streets, public services and so forth. Nevertheless, the rationale behind this premise could be challenged owing to an unsettled question if this mayor could be reliable and he/she is commitment toward his/her promises. One point that should not go unnoticed is that maybe the mayor make promise in order to save his/her position and encourage people in order to vote him/her. In fact, there is possibility that mayor does not be commitment and forget everything after election.
Having scrutinized the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there is a number of question, having been ignored by the author while the answer of which could add to the logic of each premise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...n countryside. One point that should be consider is that the author does not provide any...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to clear'
Suggestion: to clear
...tics about retires who prefer to choose clear views. In fact, there is possibility th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 13.6137724551 162% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 28.8173652695 139% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 423.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96453900709 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56103994646 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 204.123752495 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541371158392 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.471057884232 212% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2995271841 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.70786347227 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132591155975 0.218282227539 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408395952837 0.0743258471296 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423579323383 0.0701772020484 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702641032397 0.128457276422 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494265320521 0.0628817314937 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.