The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.
"During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job accidents are fatigue and sleep deprivation among workers. Therefore, to reduce the number of on-the-job accidents at Quiot and thereby increase productivity, we should shorten each of our three work shifts by one hour so that employees will get adequate amounts of sleep."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
In a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing stated that to reduce the number of on-the-job accidents at quiot and increase the productivity authority should cut the three shifts work hour by one hour so that workers can grain strength for work. However, before this recommendation can fully evaluate the following three assumptions must analyze.
First of all, the author assumes that past year cited 30 percent increased on-the-job- accidents on quiot was analyze scientifically. Perhaps it was an approximated comparison with the nearly penoply industries plant and also there is no evidence on current year result s of the comparison between the two companies. However, if the above scenarios true then the argument is significantly unwarranted.
Secondly, mentioned experts assume that the health issues were the cause of on-the-job accidents. Maybe the fatigues or sleep-deprivation were not the cause of the accidents. Perhaps there was some technical fault on the machines, which lead the accidents. It is also possible that workers are not fully trained to work in the company. And in the end, they face accidents. In addition to maybe the environment in which the workers' work is not suitable for them, and they lose concentration which causes accidents. If the above assumptions are true ten the original argument does not hold water.
Finally, the experts assume that reduction in a working hour can increase productivity with a decrease in on-the-job accidents. It is possible that reduction in a working hour did not come with a profit. On the contrary, workers are doing their jobs more hastily due to the shortage of time to finish the work, which may increase the accidents. In the end, the company can face bankruptcy. However, if the above assumptions are true then the argument significantly weakened.
In conclusion, the argument as it stands now is fully flawed due to its reliance on some unwarranted assumptions. If the author can show evidence of the following assumptions with the more systemically studied assumption, then the above recommendations about the reduction in the working shifts hour in quoit manufacturing can fully evaluate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llowing three assumptions must analyze. First of all, the author assumes that pa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'analyzed'.
Suggestion: analyzed
...ased on-the-job- accidents on quiot was analyze scientifically. Perhaps it was an appro...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... argument is significantly unwarranted. Secondly, mentioned experts assume that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 515, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e concentration which causes accidents. If the above assumptions are true ten the ...
^^
Line 9, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... original argument does not hold water. Finally, the experts assume that reducti...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'shifts'' or 'shift's'?
Suggestion: shifts'; shift's
...ions about the reduction in the working shifts hour in quoit manufacturing can fully e...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 349.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29226361032 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07432632229 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484240687679 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 705.55239521 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.79572954 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2105263158 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.70786347227 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221280232719 0.218282227539 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556979574328 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866663769172 0.0701772020484 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132071623919 0.128457276422 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913354426473 0.0628817314937 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.