The dean of Omega University suggests to terminate the process of evaluation of professors as this is a reason that students of this university are not able to secure jobs. At first glance the memorandum seems to be convincing. But on deeper look it has many loopholes.
Firstly, it is given in the letter that the process of evaluation of professors encouraged students to assess professors. This is an important procedure as many teachers shows laid back attitude towards completion of the course, or in clearing doubts of students, and many of them do not show much interest in teaching in classes as they want students to join tuition classes after college. This procedure encourage professors to teach well in the class as they are aware of consequences of not teaching in their classes. In case some of students are not giving honest review regarding professors that does not mean that all students are providing flawed review. Mostly students are concerned towards gaining knowledge from teachers in order to do well in examinations.
Secondly, it is not necessary that good marks are secured by students due advantage given by their professors. Maybe students are veraciously doing well in exams. There may be the case that question paper is not difficult, thus, students are getting marks easily in examinations. In such case, Omega University is required to change their question paper pattern so that students study hard to get good marks in the tests. This do not indicate that professors are distributing free marks in exams so that students evaluate their teaching nicely.
Lastly, perhaps students are not able to get jobs as they are not able to perform well in interviews. In such case, the university is required to set up personality development classes for students. So that students are able to crack interview for jobs. It may be the case that Alpha University is providing courses that are in demand in market and thus, students are getting more job opportunities. Perhaps Omega University are not offering such courses and required to introduce them.
To sum up, as aforementioned reasons are ignored by the dean of the university. The arguer is required to do more research before making the proposal for removal of professor teaching evaluation procedure.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 377 350
No. of Characters: 1870 1500
No. of Different Words: 170 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.406 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.96 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.744 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.85 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.534 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.548 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.095 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests terminating'.
Suggestion: suggests terminating
The dean of Omega University suggests to terminate the process of evaluation of professors...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the students') or simply say ''some students''.
Suggestion: some of the students; some students
... not teaching in their classes. In case some of students are not giving honest review regarding ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 377.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0848806366 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82341524053 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4953533173 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.85 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233674916959 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721855296317 0.0743258471296 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478813618919 0.0701772020484 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131363455628 0.128457276422 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390454045535 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.