The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station.
"To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here after their retirement. We must make listeners of these new residents. We could switch to a music format tailored to their tastes, but a continuing decline in local sales of recorded music suggests limited interest in music. Instead we should change to a news and talk format, a form of radio that is increasingly popular in our area."
The assumptions of the manager of WWAC radio station are written in the memo about changing radio format to the news and talk format sounds illogically convincing with several reasons. The manager ignored important information and some questions needed to be answered in order to decide that the recommendation is likely to have predicted result.
First, relies in the fact that listener numbers of WWAC have declined, the author infers that audiences do not like rock-music format. However, it is not necessarily the case. People may do not like to spend time for listening radio because they favor to watch television or use the Internet, and this declining listener does not relate format of the radio. Without considering this possible scenario, the author can not justifiably conclude that people do not like listen the radio because of rock-music format.
Second, the author relies that new resident do not like to listen music because declining in the local sales of recorded music. Nonetheless, it is entirely possible the horrible economic condition decrease the peoples’ revenue, so they can not purchase music from stores. Or even, increasing the prices in music store causes people tend to listen to music in radio. Since, the author ignore this possible factors, he can not conclude people are not interest in music.
In the third place, the soundness of the conclusion that news and talk format can attract more listener should be answered by the manager. There is no evidence to show that people’s interested in talk format is more that that of the music format. In short, since the argument relies on limited information, I cannot take the author’s final conclusion seriously.
In sum, the argument is rationally flawed and therefore unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide more statistical information of age of population growth. In order to evaluate better the recommendation, we need to know all effective factors decrease the number of listeners and sales music at local stores.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...pos;s interested in talk format is more that that of the music format. In short, since th...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'in short', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26329787234 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.164893617021 0.15541462614 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0718085106383 0.0836205057962 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0558510638298 0.0520304965353 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0212765957447 0.0272364105082 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130319148936 0.125424944231 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0372340425532 0.0416121511921 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.800315788 2.79052419416 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0345744680851 0.026700313972 129% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101063829787 0.113004496875 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0212765957447 0.0255425247493 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00265957446809 0.0127820249294 21% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2063.0 2731.13054187 76% => OK
No of words: 331.0 446.07635468 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23262839879 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.419939577039 0.378187486979 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293051359517 0.287650121315 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.220543806647 0.208842608468 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132930513595 0.135150697306 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.800315788 2.79052419416 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 207.018472906 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516616314199 0.469332199767 110% => OK
Word variations: 53.8207549052 52.1807786196 103% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6875 23.2022227129 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.550478793 57.7814097925 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.9375 141.986410481 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 23.2022227129 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.724660767414 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 49.9926359517 51.9672348444 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.78021978022 1.8405768891 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445744872617 0.441005458295 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139262632053 0.135418324435 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0948230223598 0.0829849096947 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.638973662131 0.58762219726 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.110103943917 0.147661913831 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203430808884 0.193483328276 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738283519841 0.0970749176394 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.42302595849 0.42659136922 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0776009197068 0.0774707102158 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308469252104 0.312017818177 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344184125037 0.0698173142475 49% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.