The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council. "Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the past two years, however, the town's residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in previous years. Next month the amount of recycled material—which includes paper, plastic, and metal—should further increase, since charges for pickup of other household garbage will double. Furthermore, over 90 percent of the respondents to a recent survey said that they would do more recycling in the future. Because of our town's strong commitment to recycling, the available space in our landfill should last for considerably longer than predicted."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The conclusion drawn from the assumption that didn’t considered all aspects in which it contains flaws as the west egg town council uses the west egg’s landfill used as the garbage disposal and they did mention that they are chance of picking of garbage will be double so we can’t come to conclusion that land will last father than predicted
Firstly the town is also doing the recycling in there materials in last two years so as they are doing recycling in every year by doing one more time will not muchly decrease in the garbage as they will already recycle in any way and the there are lot of elements that are used in the household that need to be reused than the recycle and they need lot work to recycle to do which they will not do so long.
Secondly the author says that there is futher increase in the pickup in the other household garbage which clearly indicates that the garbage disposal will clearly increasing than decreasing so they may be few items that recycling but there are lot more itey that are dumping into garbage which will increase in the disposal land
Finally the just considered the present householders in to consideration but there are going pick more garbage into remaining house which as much as now so there will increase in the landfld as there are more house who dump there garbage there and clearly it will increase the garabage rather than decrease
To conclude the assumption based on which the conclusion made on unbiased as there is increases in the collection of the garbage twice as mach as now so they did’t take that into the consideration and also they recycling every year but doing one more time will not reduce much of the garbage.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 15
No. of Words: 303 350
No. of Characters: 1374 1500
No. of Different Words: 125 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.172 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.535 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.325 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 77 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 60.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.632 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.586 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.21 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n't considered all aspects in which it contains flaws as the west egg town c...
^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat land will last father than predicted Firstly the town is also doing the recyc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
... that the garbage disposal will clearly increasing than decreasing so they may be few item...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bage which will increase in the disposal land Finally the just considered the ...
^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich will increase in the disposal land Finally the just considered the present ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... will increase in the disposal land Finally the just considered the present househo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'houses'?
Suggestion: houses
...crease in the landfld as there are more house who dump there garbage there and clearl...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease the garabage rather than decrease To conclude the assumption based on whic...
^^^^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are increases'?
Suggestion: there are increases
...hich the conclusion made on unbiased as there is increases in the collection of the garbage twice ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 2260.96107784 62% => OK
No of words: 301.0 441.139720559 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69102990033 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40517794801 2.78398813304 86% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 204.123752495 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41196013289 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 705.55239521 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 19.7664670659 10% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 150.0 22.8473053892 657% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.5 57.8364921388 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 706.0 119.503703932 591% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 150.5 23.324526521 645% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 30.5 5.70786347227 534% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138610499175 0.218282227539 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117998444327 0.0743258471296 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483098526965 0.0701772020484 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883335624636 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649338410402 0.0628817314937 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 75.9 14.3799401198 528% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -72.31 48.3550499002 -150% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.1628742515 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 60.6 12.197005988 497% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.11 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 13.59 8.32208582834 163% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 98.500998004 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 12.3882235529 420% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 62.0 11.1389221557 557% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 11.9071856287 521% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.