"Whether in politics or in business, leaders of any group need to understand that learning to compromise is ultimately more important than winning."
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your experience, observations, or reading.
I totally disagree with this statement that not only in these fields that any area in this world that compromise is the not the way forward that there are a lot of politics and business mans that are start from zero and now there taking the world forward i don't think they are compormised at there most important part of the time
The most of the entrepreneurs in the world from bottom to top of there field let take amazon where everyone seen a pic that in around 1998 that the office of amazon just a room now every knows that he is one of the world richest person of course with his lot of hard work but there are times where you need to choose or compromise but he didn't so now he is here if he compromised i don't think he would reach this level
In case if take politics let take case of Mr modi the prime minister as every one know that he used to sell tea at railway stations in childhood and now with lot of hard work and dedication he become the pm of india thought it took a lot of time to become prime minister to india but before that he chif minister to state of gujarat for more than three years where he took a lot of bold steps to developed the state without any compromise buy see these the people of india choose him to lead country
So i conclude that there are lot more people in the world that are winning by not compromise than the others who are compromising and if start compromising you will get used to it in the every aspert or every situation of life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the not the'. Did you mean 'not the'?
Suggestion: not the
...y area in this world that compromise is the not the way forward that there are a lot of pol...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd now there taking the world forward i dont think they are compormised at there mos...
^^^^
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at there most important part of the time The most of the entrepreneurs in the wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...you need to choose or compromise but he didnt so now he is here if he compromised i d...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t so now he is here if he compromised i dont think he would reach this level I...
^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d i dont think he would reach this level In case if take politics let take case o...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople of india choose him to lead country So i conclude that there are lot more pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 4, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...dia choose him to lead country So i conclude that there are lot more people...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.18685121107 5.05705443957 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16585227036 2.79657885939 77% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463667820069 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 289.0 23.0359550562 1255% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1210.0 118.986275619 1017% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 289.0 23.4991977007 1230% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 22.0 5.21951772744 421% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117721254415 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117721254415 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816283753593 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220181073994 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 142.8 14.1392134831 1010% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -204.94 48.8420337079 -420% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 113.6 12.1743820225 933% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 8.5 12.1639044944 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.39 8.38706741573 231% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 26.0 100.480337079 26% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.8971910112 445% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 117.6 11.2143820225 1049% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 118.0 11.7820224719 1002% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.