'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.
“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level.”
The memorandum from the business manager of a television station orders their employees to Restore their time devoted to weather and local news to its former level. This is order is based on the more number of complaints received from viewers over the concern of the station's coverage of weather and local news and the local businesses cancellation of advertising contracts during the late-night news program. The argument misses the clarity and can be explained with a few additional information that is stated below.
The manager here didn't mention why the local businesses canceled their deal during a late-night news program. for example, this could be because the businesses would no longer want to advertise late-night as the already got popular enough or they want to change their advertising mode from digital to banners and flexes. If the above example is true then it weakens the author's conclusion.
The author also didn't state why the time for weather and local news is reduced and devoted more towards national news. For example, this may have happened because the weather news viewers rate wasn't well and so the switch happened or maybe the weather doesn't require that much time. This example if true can put the author's conclusion into pieces.
The author wanted to increase the revenue but there may be few other ways to increase rather than devoting weather and local news to its former level. For example, the station could have broadcasted more interesting and useful news so their viewership increases. This tells there is no logic in the author's conclusion based on assumptions.
The memorandum here is lacking evidence to be explained logically.This requires more evidence to explain. otherwise, the conclusion is assumed to be very weak.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 293 350
No. of Characters: 1454 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.962 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.55 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 107 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.751 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.383 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.644 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
...ed from viewers over the concern of the stations coverage of weather and local news and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'businesses'' or 'business's'?
Suggestion: businesses'; business's
...of weather and local news and the local businesses cancellation of advertising contracts d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal information that is stated below. The manager here didnt mention why the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... The manager here didnt mention why the local businesses cancel...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... deal during a late-night news program. for example, this could be because the busi...
^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ode from digital to banners and flexes. If the above example is true then it weake...
^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ove example is true then it weakens the authors conclusion. The ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en it weakens the authors conclusion. The author also didnt state why the time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... The author also didnt state why the time for weather and loca...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...d because the weather news viewers rate wasnt well and so the switch happened or mayb...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he switch happened or maybe the weather doesnt require that much time. This example if...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... time. This example if true can put the authors conclusion into pieces. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the authors conclusion into pieces. The author wanted to increase the revenu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...es. This tells there is no logic in the authors conclusion based on assumptions. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hors conclusion based on assumptions. The memorandum here is lacking evidence ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...king evidence to be explained logically.This requires more evidence to explain. othe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Otherwise
...This requires more evidence to explain. otherwise, the conclusion is assumed to be very w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 288.0 441.139720559 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15277777778 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60613582957 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 204.123752495 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503472222222 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9295174941 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 5.25449101796 324% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376705263145 0.218282227539 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125792363967 0.0743258471296 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123550299286 0.0701772020484 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203841003313 0.128457276422 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123729563678 0.0628817314937 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.