There is this memo disbursed by the business manager of a television station supposedly to it's telecasting department about the loss of local advertising contracts for the elongated late night new program. There seems to be a recommendation for the restoration of the duration for local weather news. Though the manager appeared to provide with valid points, he failed to substantiate his claim with valid evidences that can strengthen his suggestion.
Firstly, the business manager did not provide plausible statement for the cancellation of the local business advertising contracts. It may not be the reason regarding the dragged late night news programs as the audience watching the channel in late nights is apparently negligible compared to the daytime. If this is the reason behind the loss of contracts, then the manager's claim over the late night news program does not hold strength.
Furthermore, the duration of the weather news tops the priority whenever there is an extreme catastrophic condition. Otherwise, the weather news must be futile among the local people. Upon extending the duration of the weather coverage, does not ensure any viable advertisement revenue in this case. There is a possibility for the local people to be curious about the same locality news. However, a late night program about the local news is again a bad timing to keep the audience awake.
To summarize, the manager's argument about the national news at late hour is not plausible if the nocturnal audience for the shows telecasted are very meagre compared to day-time customers.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 253 350
No. of Characters: 1299 1500
No. of Different Words: 130 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.988 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.134 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.776 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.083 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.238 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.406 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.406 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
... the audience awake. To summarize, the managers argument about the national news at lat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 11.1786427146 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 2260.96107784 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 253.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22529644269 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84564667698 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 705.55239521 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6245512796 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.166666667 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.70786347227 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36158606493 0.218282227539 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143024348216 0.0743258471296 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066526551155 0.0701772020484 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22374307824 0.128457276422 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487782344423 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.