The chart illustrates the crowd gathered for three different event types for the years 2017, and forecasts through 2020 to 2030 after a major renovation in the Grandville stadium. The stadium conducts theater, sporting and concert events.
Overall, the sporting event has dominated the graph with a whooping attendance every year. The crowd pulled by the concerts seems to have a drastic positive impact prognosticated for 2030. While, the theater events contributes to a very meagre attendance right from the beginning.
The year 2017 have seen a majority of the people attending the sporting events with a clean sweep of around 149000. There is dramatic gap of audience between the leading sporting and the concert events. A very meagre amount of audience could be observed for both concert and the theater events.
With refurbishment around the place in 2019, prescience for 2020 and 2030 is clearly attributed based on the improvements in the stadium. The year 2020 will observe a meaningful improvement in the concerts with about 40,000 people expected to attend. The number is double the attendance that was recorded earlier in 2017 for the concerts. With the attendance for sporting event levelling off by 2020 and no major improvement from the theater events for 2020, the stadium is expected to experience a very negligible influence even after the improvements implemented.
By 2030, people attending the concerts will remarkably grow by 175% compared to the record in 2020. This is followed by the theater events showing a tremendous improvement of around 145% compared to the 2020 population. Theater is expected to touch it's peak in 2030 with around 49000 audiences for the event. There is only a meagre increase of around 10000 people that will be observed in the audience count for sporting events by 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ositive impact prognosticated for 2030. While, the theater events contributes to a ve...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence count for sporting events by 2030.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15488215488 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71771614087 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464646464646 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4808102121 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242871887238 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915005149193 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746438202003 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16186478215 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867232608198 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.