The following is a memorandum from the business manger of a television station.
" Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contract with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In the memorandum from the business manger of television station, it is concluded that to increase the number of viewer of late-night program then need to refoused on the wheather news and local news insted of the national news. To support his conclusion, manger gave a refrence for the increased number of complaints from the viewer concerned with the coverage of weather and local news. Also, support his idea which can help to again gain advertising revenues. But, mangers idea is based on the series of assumption and evidence for below three point need to be provided for reaching the best possible conclusion.
Firstly, no evidence is provided that increase in the complaints is due to coverage of national news in late-night slot only. It may be possible that, new time slot provided for local news and wheather new is doing their job properly and past slot (late-night) for local news and wheather news in very good in coverage of news. If this is possibly ture that it will easily wekan the conclsion of the manger.
Secondly, No evidence is provided that tha loss of advertising business is due to the incresed devoted time for national news or due to complaints of viewer. It is possible that local businesses were not making much profit due to which local busineese not prefer to put there money in advertising. Or it is also possible that local business found that avdertising in newspaper is more benifical for them then advertising on televison. If any of two points has a potential then it will easily weaken the mangers conclusion.
Lastly, no evidance is provided about eagarness of viewer for local news and wheather news. Possibly from last one year local wheathe is not good and due to which local life has major impact. if this will be ture then it will weaken the mangers conclusion.
In conclusion, the argument is stading has flaws due to its reliance on the some of assumption. Manger need to provided the evidence for the points asked in the above paragapgh (perhaps in the form of reaserach study). To reach prove correctness of mangers conclusion above evidence is required
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: It may be possible that, new time slot provided for local news and wheather new is doing their job properly and past slot late-night for local news and wheather news in very good in coverage of news.
Error: wheather Suggestion: whether
Error: may Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: news Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: late-night Suggestion: late night
Sentence: If this is possibly ture that it will easily wekan the conclsion of the manger.
Error: wekan Suggestion: wean
Error: ture Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: conclsion Suggestion: conclusion
Sentence: Secondly, No evidence is provided that tha loss of advertising business is due to the incresed devoted time for national news or due to complaints of viewer.
Error: news Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: tha Suggestion: than
Error: incresed Suggestion: increased
Sentence: It is possible that local businesses were not making much profit due to which local busineese not prefer to put there money in advertising.
Error: busineese Suggestion: business
Sentence: Or it is also possible that local business found that avdertising in newspaper is more benifical for them then advertising on televison.
Error: televison Suggestion: television
Error: benifical Suggestion: beneficial
Error: avdertising Suggestion: advertising
Sentence: Lastly, no evidance is provided about eagarness of viewer for local news and wheather news.
Error: wheather Suggestion: whether
Error: evidance Suggestion: evidence
Error: news Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: eagarness Suggestion: eagerness
Sentence: Possibly from last one year local wheathe is not good and due to which local life has major impact. if this will be ture then it will weaken the mangers conclusion.
Error: wheathe Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: ture Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: In conclusion, the argument is stading has flaws due to its reliance on the some of assumption.
Error: stading Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Manger need to provided the evidence for the points asked in the above paragapgh perhaps in the form of reaserach study.
Error: reaserach Suggestion: research
Error: paragapgh Suggestion: paragraph
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 22 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 360 350
No. of Characters: 1710 1500
No. of Different Words: 155 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.356 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.75 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.548 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.039 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.358 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: MANGER_MANAGER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'business manager'?
Suggestion: business manager
In the memorandum from the business manger of television station, it is concluded ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... news in very good in coverage of news. If this is possibly ture that it will easi...
^^
Line 9, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...for them then advertising on televison. If any of two points has a potential then ...
^^
Line 9, column 504, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mangers'' or 'manger's'?
Suggestion: mangers'; manger's
...otential then it will easily weaken the mangers conclusion. Lastly, no evidance is...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e to which local life has major impact. if this will be ture then it will weaken t...
^^
Line 13, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e to which local life has major impact. if this will be ture then it will weaken t...
^^
Line 13, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mangers'' or 'manger's'?
Suggestion: mangers'; manger's
...is will be ture then it will weaken the mangers conclusion. In conclusion, the arg...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 77, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ng has flaws due to its reliance on the some of assumption. Manger need to provided ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 2260.96107784 78% => OK
No of words: 360.0 441.139720559 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88611111111 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61579809836 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430555555556 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9987312393 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.470588235 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.70786347227 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331815174587 0.218282227539 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106579992062 0.0743258471296 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113370224203 0.0701772020484 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191039783201 0.128457276422 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997916134521 0.0628817314937 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.