The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora.“Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora’s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora’s ci

Essay topics:

The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora.

“Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora’s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora’s citizens met the standards as then defined. But these experts are mistaken when they suggest that spending too much time using computers has caused a decline in fitness. Since overall fitness levels are highest in regions of Corpora where levels of computer ownership are also highest, it is clear that using computers has not made citizens less physically fit. Instead, as shown by this year’s unusually low expenditures on fitness-related products and services, the recent decline in the economy is most likely the cause, and fitness levels will improve when the economy does”

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

In the health magazine of Corpora medical experts say that only one-quarter of corpora citizen meet the current standards for physical fitness which far lower then the results from the twenty years ago. And to explain this decrease level of fitness, use of computer for a long time is reason but which found flaws in region where use of computer is highest. As per author opinion, low expenditures on fitness related product is one of reason of decrease level of fitness. But, the article in the magazine is based on the some of the unstated assumption which need to be examine for finding the correctness of article of magazine.

To begin, Magazine is comparing the current fitness standards with the fitness standards twenty year ago. But, no evidence provided that both the standards are the still same. It may be possible that previous standard was as strict as current one. If people of corpora twenty year ago are not as fit as now but due to low standard of fitness level many percentage of people meet the standards easily. If above point as any merits then it will significantly weaken the authors argument.

In addition, author of argument state that low-expenditures on fitness product and services is cause by the recent decline of economy and expected that expenditures on fitness product and services will increase if economy improve which seem flaws. For instance, economy in next year is get improved but people of corpora is not willing to expend much on the fitness product and services instead they will add this additional money on the investment or people of corpora more likely to spend money for travelling. If either of scenario has merits then authors claim does not hold water.

Further, It was assume that use of computer has no relation with the fitness by giving example of area of corpora where use of computer is highest. It is likely that people of corpora where use of computer is highest is more concerned about there fitness and they are more aware about the bad effect of use of computer on the fitness. Therefore, they take effect to make them fit and reduce the consequence of the effect of use of compute on the fitness. If above scenario has a potential the it will significantly weaken the claim of author regarding contradict condition in corpora regarding relation of fitness and use of computer.

In conclusion, Above assumes made of author in the

Votes
Average: 6.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lower than'?
Suggestion: lower than
...tandards for physical fitness which far lower then the results from the twenty years ago. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 522, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...article in the magazine is based on the some of the unstated assumption which need t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 522, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...article in the magazine is based on the some of the unstated assumption which need to be ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
...ut due to low standard of fitness level many percentage of people meet the standards easily. If...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s then it will significantly weaken the authors argument. In addition, author of a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... addition, author of argument state that low-expenditures on fitness product and ...
^^
Line 9, column 515, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e likely to spend money for travelling. If either of scenario has merits then auth...
^^
Line 13, column 17, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'assumed'.
Suggestion: assumed
...es not hold water. Further, It was assume that use of computer has no relation wi...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 490, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ness. If above scenario has a potential the it will significantly weaken the claim of ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 411.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86861313869 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57216859678 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430656934307 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9977026058 57.8364921388 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.705882353 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1764705882 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.70786347227 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219185563251 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079496354256 0.0743258471296 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109383671693 0.0701772020484 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121073327082 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993331495639 0.0628817314937 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 98.500998004 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 411 350
No. of Characters: 1951 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.503 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.747 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.521 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.222 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.765 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5