If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees,we encourage our residents to late last year our neighbouring town,Hayesworth has seen garbage disposal cost significantly decrease.If we implemented advertisingcampaign encouragingour residents to recycle Masontown would also save moneyon disposal of its waste.-write an argument ont his topic that is sent to editor of a newspaper.
The recommendation made by the author is flawed for various reasons. While the intention of the author to save money on disposal of waste is noble, the method of implementing this proposal is not viable, rendering the prediction uncertain.
The author purports that an advertising campaign would be successful in persuading the residents of Masontown to recycle the waste. This claim is unjustified. It cannot be assured that most of the residents would be moved by the advertising campaign. Unless something is enforced on the residents, they often tend to ignore such advertisements. It is very hard to change a hard-wired habit, if the residents have never recycled their wastes, then a simple advertising campaign wouldn't change such a habit.
If the residents have never recycled their waste that means they are simply not concerned about saving the money on disposal. Some of the questions like the income level of Masontown, and what is the current disposal fee need to be answered. If the average income level of every household is very high compared to the disposal fee, most of the residents would prefer to pay the small disposal fee than to recycle their waste. Recycling of waste could be a tedious process and would require time and effort from residents. Nothing is known about the residents of Mason town. In case they are rich and lazy, they would not think twice about saving money. Such a fee might be insignificantly small to most of the residents.
However, If a strict law is passed by the government for recycling of waste and if a heavy fine is levied on the residents, then the circumstances might change. People might take up recycling as they do not have a choice, consequently, money would also be saved. The success of Haynesworth can be attributed to the fact that it imposed a compulsion on its residents, However, the same can't be said about Masontown because an advertising campaign would not be very influential.
In conclusion, the authors claim that an advertising campaign would be successful in changing the habit of the residents is without basis. Hence the prediction that Masontown will save disposal fee is unwarranted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver recycled their wastes, then a simple advertising campaign wouldnt change such...
^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...es, then a simple advertising campaign wouldnt change such a habit. If the resident...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ampaign wouldnt change such a habit. If the residents have never recycled their...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ned about saving the money on disposal. Some of the questions like the income level of Maso...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... like the income level of Masontown, and what is the current disposal fee need to...
^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ion on its residents, However, the same cant be said about Masontown because an adve...
^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...abit of the residents is without basis. Hence the prediction that Masontown will save...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23677581864 0.25644967241 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.181360201511 0.15541462614 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0705289672544 0.0836205057962 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0528967254408 0.0520304965353 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0302267002519 0.0272364105082 111% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130982367758 0.125424944231 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0604534005038 0.0416121511921 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87081839234 2.79052419416 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0251889168766 0.026700313972 94% => OK
Particles: 0.00251889168766 0.001811407834 139% => OK
Determiners: 0.125944584383 0.113004496875 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0377833753149 0.0255425247493 148% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00251889168766 0.0127820249294 20% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2171.0 2731.13054187 79% => OK
No of words: 362.0 446.07635468 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99723756906 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339779005525 0.378187486979 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256906077348 0.287650121315 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201657458564 0.208842608468 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149171270718 0.135150697306 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87081839234 2.79052419416 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 207.018472906 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46408839779 0.469332199767 99% => OK
Word variations: 48.101756527 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0526315789 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8011810376 57.7814097925 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.263157895 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.724660767414 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.58251231527 195% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 44.7432393138 51.9672348444 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.61904761905 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11968928426 0.441005458295 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121034298883 0.135418324435 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102064702686 0.0829849096947 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.560597201986 0.58762219726 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.181013939432 0.147661913831 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603098212291 0.193483328276 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401165121545 0.0970749176394 41% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.438399903669 0.42659136922 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0598841140399 0.0774707102158 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858774249948 0.312017818177 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325374655843 0.0698173142475 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 14.657635468 89% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.