The Demon-Haunted World
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: In conclusion the mentioned logical felicity that to combate vitamin A deficiency in the nation of Tagus goverment should promote a newly engineered types of millet which is high in vitamin A, made by the author is ambiguous and misleading.
Error: goverment Suggestion: government
Error: combate Suggestion: No alternate word
----------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- not exactly
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 540 350
No. of Characters: 2582 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.821 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.781 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.567 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 189 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.765 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.746 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.882 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.383 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.61 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.138 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...ple of Tagus this claim is impractical. Besides It can be possible that people of Tagus...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...mer, though the will be paid subsidies. but the author doesnt mentioned that who wi...
^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... will be paid subsidies. but the author doesnt mentioned that who will pay this subsid...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...thor doesnt mentioned that who will pay this subsidies or the government of this imp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...age this additional fund for subsidies. Moreover It is not impossible that government of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...situation instead of improving that. In addition the Farming of this newly engineered ty...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...e of millet, also the rural farmer will had to get training to learn to cultivate t...
^^^
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...e rural farmer will had to get training to learn to cultivate this newly engineered mill...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...wly engineered millet will be different than old type millet, which can cause the pe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 713, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bility that this organization is here to use the people of Tagus to run experimen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 55.5748502994 137% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2637.0 2260.96107784 117% => OK
No of words: 540.0 441.139720559 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88333333333 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62546030976 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390740740741 0.468620217663 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 842.4 705.55239521 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1824171077 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.85 119.503703932 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35 5.70786347227 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447297292177 0.218282227539 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150546640966 0.0743258471296 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127914152475 0.0701772020484 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235740676749 0.128457276422 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095348158635 0.0628817314937 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.