Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Before claiming my opinion, I would like to define the term of ‘restrictions’ in a relatively narrow view, meaning the regulations that limit the exposure of scientific topics. Outside of this definition, I would position any written regulations as guidelines, instead of restrictions. Following this sense, I would generally agree that the government should not impose restrictions on scientific research and development. However, guidelines to regulate the preceding deployment of the scientific research in the real world is essential.
To begin with, it is no doubt that any breakthrough of scientific research comes from the openness and unlimited curiosity, or even start from questioning the authority and existing finding toward certain topics. For example, the rediscovery of the relative location among the earth and other planets, which stated that the earth is not positioned at the center of the galaxy but the sun is, actually resulted from a challenge of the long-lasting but untrue point of view about the earth. In fact, the wrong assumption of the earth position can last is due to the restriction of the governments, or the elite group back then. Therefore, it is pertinent to say that by removing the restrictions, science can finally free for rapid development and contribute to the succeeding scientific revolution as well as the industrial revolution.
Likewise, it is common to see that more advanced development of scientific research generally comes from nations with less government restrictions, such as the US and EU. These two democratic regions lead most of the scientific development nowadays, ranging from infotech, biotech to data-related technologies. Hence, the prompt is also supported by the empirical evidence that the mature scientific research grows from free land with less restrictions.
However, though fewer restrictions seem generally positive to promote the development of scientific research, it is equally important to consider the impact that scientific research brings in the real world. For instance, with the disruption of infotech, most of our personal data is being used by tech giants without our personal consent. What worse is that when no government guidelines are being imposed, then the tech giant and relevant parties who misuse our personal data won’t have to take any responsibility for the trouble they made. The most notorious example is the scandal of Cambridge Analytica which is confirmed to use leaking personal data from Facebook to interfere with the US presidential election. This well illustrates the importance of the guideline to regulate the misuse of the technology.
In conclusion, I support the liberal perspective, not to restrict scientific research. However, I also state the importance of guidelines necessary to stop the unexpected harm that is brought by advanced technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun restrictions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ific research grows from free land with less restrictions. However, though fewer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, hence, however, if, likewise, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50564334086 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15449003686 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528216704289 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8549763915 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.21951772744 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223824000106 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700406810538 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043431908906 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117478854958 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302352014415 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.