An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid

The recommendation states that a new type of millet will help reduce Vitamin A deficiency among people of Tagus. However, this recommendation is incomplete and cannot be used to draw conclusions.

Firstly, we need to know if the seeds of the new type of millet are different from the old type of millet seeds or not. This will enable us to gauge whether these new seeds require more water, better soil quality to grow etc or will the older provisions of Tagus will be enough to cultivate this new type of millet. Even if farmers are given subsidies, the genetically engineered millets may require some special fertiliser which has to be provided to farmers along with lessons on how to cultivate these millets. This will not only ensure compliance by farmers in cultivating this crop but will also ensure that the farm land can be reused and soil quality is maintained.

Secondly, we will need to know if the taste of engineered breed is acceptable by the people of Tagus to readily adopt it in their daily diet.Moreover, prices of this new type of millet have to be regulated by concerned authorities so that this new millet if affordable for Tagus. Also. ensuring sufficient supply of this millet, will have a positive effect on the availability of this crop. Is the supply chain Is not broken, people might be tempted to buy this type of millet.

Lastly, it is mentioned that the government of Tagus should do everything it can do to promote this new type of millet. However, only promoting will not help to ameliorate the problem of Vitamin A deficiency among people in Tagus. If the population of Tagus is impoverished, the government should think of schemes like Minimum Support Price for people living below the poverty line along with the promotion of benefits of the new type of millet so that the general population of Tugas can buy and consume this breed of millet.

Thus, if the above suggestions are followed, there will be a high chance of improving Vitamin A levels in the people of Tugas.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...to readily adopt it in their daily diet.Moreover, prices of this new type of millet have...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: As well
...his new millet if affordable for Tagus. Also. ensuring sufficient supply of this mil...
^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...his new millet if affordable for Tagus. Also. ensuring sufficient supply of this mil...
^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ensuring
...w millet if affordable for Tagus. Also. ensuring sufficient supply of this millet, will ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of millet so that the general population of Tugas can buy and consume this breed ...
^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A level' or simply 'levels'?
Suggestion: A level; Levels
...l be a high chance of improving Vitamin A levels in the people of Tugas.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 350.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76285714286 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67634993594 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465714285714 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1102598881 57.8364921388 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.230769231 119.503703932 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 5.70786347227 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494761376082 0.218282227539 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197287938865 0.0743258471296 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889450824342 0.0701772020484 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28517471183 0.128457276422 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626570454887 0.0628817314937 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.3550499002 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 351 350
No. of Characters: 1623 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.328 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.624 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.567 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.916 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.397 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.647 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.13 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5