The chart below shows numbers of adults participating in different major sports in one area, in 1997 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the number of adults (in thousands) taking part in major sports of a particular region in the years 1997 and 2017. In general, total number of people engaging in sports was higher in 2017 than in 1997. Most sport categories saw an increase in adult participation from 1997 to 2017.
More specifically, the most popular activity by adults in both years was Gentle Walking. Least participation was seen in Basketball in 1997. Cricket was the least popular choice in 2017. The number of gym goers remain constant at about 35,000 in both years. For jogging, there was only a marginal increase from around 33,000 adults in 1997 to around 34,000 adults in 2017.
Surprisingly, the highest jump in any sport category was in the case of Basketball closely followed by Hiking and Football. In case of cricket, there is a significant drop from 26,000 adults in 1997 to 5,000 adults in 2017.
To sum up, there was an increase in the number of adults participating in these seven major sports of a given area from 1997 to 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
...dults in both years was Gentle Walking. Least participation was seen in Basketball in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om 26,000 adults in 1997 to 5,000 adults in 2017. To sum up, there was an inc...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ults in 1997 to 5,000 adults in 2017. To sum up, there was an increase in the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76373626374 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60006246848 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9705089206 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8181818182 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255979009376 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117031901769 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784692638795 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192185290313 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835461753103 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.