In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirtand kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employeesworking at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far fewer sick days than employees working in buildingscleaned with other cleansers. Therefore, to prevent employee illness, all companies should use CleanAll astheir industrial cleanser.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure toexplain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument ifthe assumptions prove unwarranted.
The argument states that CleanAll is the best cleanser and to prevent employee illness, all companies should use CleanAll as their industrial cleanser. This argument is based on certain assumptions which need to be discussed.
Firstly, laboratory had done study of only two different industrial cleansers which might have different composition. Between the two it considers CleanAll as the best cleanser. It was found that CleanAll removed 40% more dirt and killed 30% more bacteria. Since the laboratory used only two cleansers so one of the two has to be better than the other one and it comes out that the best one is CleanAll. But if the study was done on more than two cleansers of different categories then we would have clearly known that which cleanser is the best and should be used for the best results.
Secondly, all employees working at buildings were healthy and they took fewer sick days leave. It seems like that health of employees is based on the cleanser used in the building rather than their diet or the other activities they do. The study showed where CleanAll is used employees are healthy, they don't get sick. The study didn't mention on which kinds of buildings did it do the research. If the study has been done on same kind of buildings then CleanAll might be the best cleaner. If not, say one building is some corporate office and other one is a big city hospital where ill people are treated, in this case the conclusion will fall apart.
Lastly, it took the assumption that all buildings working and hygienic conditions are the same. Suppose the experiment is done on some buildings which are clean corporate offices and some of them might be manufacturing industries like leather industry. Then it is obvious that the percentage of dirt removed and bacteria killed might be different in these category of buildings. If hygienic conditions are same, then we can surely say that CleanAll can be used as an industrial cleanser but if there is different working conditions of buildings then we need to do some more experiments to reach to any conclusion.
Therefore, according to the assumptions discussed we need to consider certain working conditions, number of healthy or unhealthy employees or need to do some extra research on some other industrial cleansers also. If stated assumptions are warranted then we can say we can use CleanAll but if some or any of the assumptions are false then our conclusion should be based on some more experimentation and study.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 426 350
No. of Characters: 2033 1500
No. of Different Words: 171 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.543 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.772 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.633 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.421 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.816 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.34 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.56 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leanser used in the building rather than their diet or the other activities they ...
^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...All is used employees are healthy, they dont get sick. The study didnt mention on wh...
^^^^
Line 9, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... healthy, they dont get sick. The study didnt mention on which kinds of buildings did...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 397, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ds of buildings did it do the research. If the study has been done on same kind of...
^^
Line 13, column 351, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this category' or 'these categories'?
Suggestion: this category; these categories
...d bacteria killed might be different in these category of buildings. If hygienic conditions ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 209, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...arch on some other industrial cleansers also. If stated assumptions are warranted th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 424.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93160377358 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68495273033 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419811320755 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9978946925 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.052631579 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351226430718 0.218282227539 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128283213818 0.0743258471296 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102902074587 0.0701772020484 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199385180085 0.128457276422 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125128796034 0.0628817314937 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.