"Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
Manned space flight is costly and has a big risk associated with sending men and women into space. So when unmanned space probes and satellites are send into space, it is assumed that they avoid all such problems associated with manned space flight. But it cannot be true always.
In argument it has been assumed that cost associated with unmanned space satellite is comparatively less than that of manned satellite. But exact difference in the cost is not mentioned, it might be possible that cost difference is very less. But it has not been mentioned in argument.
It is possible that accuracy about the information collected by both type of satellite varies significantly. its may be possible that information collected by manned satellite is more accurate and essential foe further research and development related to space.
Risk associated with life of astronomer is well assumed in argument which makes argument very strong and not easy to weaken it.
Success of series of unmanned satellite is assumed without any strong evidence of success of manned space satellite. Success rate of manned satellite could be more if compared with unmanned satellites. But no evidence it that context has been mentioned. This factor might weaken the argument and make argument easy to not agree with given argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sent'.
Suggestion: sent
...nmanned space probes and satellites are send into space, it is assumed that they avo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...accuracy about the information collected by both type of satellite varies signifi...
^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...type of satellite varies significantly. its may be possible that information collec...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 55.5748502994 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 2260.96107784 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 214.0 441.139720559 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16822429907 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.56307096286 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69383100402 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 204.123752495 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 705.55239521 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8552209276 57.8364921388 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0769230769 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4615384615 23.324526521 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.69230769231 5.70786347227 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397503166559 0.218282227539 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144577359938 0.0743258471296 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118486226501 0.0701772020484 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212572832827 0.128457276422 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106763865346 0.0628817314937 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.3799401198 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 98.500998004 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.