The argument that has been made is that the routine administration of inoculations against cow flu, that could be effective in saving lives in ares where the disease is detected, cannot be permited as there is a small possibility of death of a person due to the inoculation.
The effectiveness of routine administration of inoculaions againt cow flu in saving lives has to be established. If inoculations are found to have no relevent positive effect then there can be a case against administering them. However, if an improvement is seen then there is more chance for giving permission for administraing them routinely.
The percentage of cases in wich the inoculatons are successful in saving lives would be directly proportional to the chances of permitting the inoculations to be routinely administered.
The claim that there is a small possibility that a person will die because of the inoculation also needs to be verified. The probability of death also needs to be established. If the chance of dying from the inoculation is higer than dying from cow flu then there is little reason for the inoculations to be permitted to be administered. However, if the probability of dying due to cow flu is much higher without the inoculation than with it then there is a strong reasn to give permission to adminster the inocultions.
The time duration for which the inoculations are effective could be considered in order to decide if inoculations could be permitted. It has been mentioned that inoculatins need to be routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected to save lives.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The argument that has been made is that the routine administration of inoculations against cow flu, that could be effective in saving lives in ares where the disease is detected, cannot be permited as there is a small possibility of death of a person due to the inoculation.
Error: permited Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: The effectiveness of routine administration of inoculaions againt cow flu in saving lives has to be established.
Error: inoculaions Suggestion: inclusions
Error: againt Suggestion: again
Sentence: If inoculations are found to have no relevent positive effect then there can be a case against administering them.
Error: relevent Suggestion: relevant
Sentence: However, if an improvement is seen then there is more chance for giving permission for administraing them routinely.
Error: administraing Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: The percentage of cases in wich the inoculatons are successful in saving lives would be directly proportional to the chances of permitting the inoculations to be routinely administered.
Error: wich Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: inoculatons Suggestion: incubators
Sentence: If the chance of dying from the inoculation is higer than dying from cow flu then there is little reason for the inoculations to be permitted to be administered.
Error: higer Suggestion: higher
Sentence: However, if the probability of dying due to cow flu is much higher without the inoculation than with it then there is a strong reasn to give permission to adminster the inocultions.
Error: adminster Suggestion: administer
Error: reasn Suggestion: reason
Sentence: It has been mentioned that inoculatins need to be routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected to save lives.
Error: inoculatins Suggestion: incubating
------------------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 267 350 //more content wanted
------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 267 350
No. of Characters: 1319 1500
No. of Different Words: 116 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.042 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.94 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.202 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.273 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.668 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.401 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.688 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.139 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in saving lives has to be established. If inoculations are found to have no relev...
^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... inoculation also needs to be verified. The probability of death also needs to be e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 11.1786427146 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 28.8173652695 35% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 267.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02621722846 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27228530864 2.78398813304 118% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 204.123752495 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453183520599 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.730579809 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.70786347227 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373014974371 0.218282227539 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155352576074 0.0743258471296 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945684227035 0.0701772020484 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223536611025 0.128457276422 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726852069182 0.0628817314937 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.3550499002 80% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 98.500998004 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 12.3882235529 129% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.