As per the report, the employers and education-providers are pointing fingers at each other for having unskilled youth. But, the statics provided to prove a stand is completely inadequate. Rather the topic left a debatable conclusion in which we could relatably take the stand based on our experience.
Firstly, nothing related to the source of the report is present in the statement. The source helps us to know about the region where the analysis is conducted. This will help to cogently demonstrate the allegation.
The author here states that 70% of employers blamed inadequate training for the shortfall in skilled worker. On the other hand , he also says that 70% of education-provider believe they suitably prepare graduates for the jobs market. While revealing the statistics, he missed to disclose the number of each side he is surveying on. This information, if provided, will accurately lead us to an ultimate allegation.
Also, the author did not mentioned about the skill area in which the youth are lacking. This relative data will guide us to get the correct view of the argument.
The author also emphasized the complaint of the employer that half of the youth they hire have insufficient or even lacking the skills of problem solving. This complaint might add point to the employers allegation, but would might lead us to the conclusion that the employer's hiring process is not efficient enough in order to meet their requirement.
In summary, we can conclude that the report contains inadequate information and should focus on providing more plausible data that can assist to reach a cogent result.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Rather the topic left a debatable conclusion in which we could relatably take the stand based on our experience.
Error: relatably Suggestion: reliably
-------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 265 350
No. of Characters: 1320 1500
No. of Different Words: 155 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.035 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.981 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.848 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 93 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.236 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.301 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.629 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.157 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...prove a stand is completely inadequate. Rather the topic left a debatable conclusion i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...all in skilled worker. On the other hand , he also says that 70% of education-prov...
^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'missed disclosing'.
Suggestion: missed disclosing
...et. While revealing the statistics, he missed to disclose the number of each side he is surveying...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
...allegation. Also, the author did not mentioned about the skill area in which the youth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employers'' or 'employer's'?
Suggestion: employers'; employer's
.... This complaint might add point to the employers allegation, but would might lead us to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o meet their requirement. In summary, we can conclude that the report contains...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, while, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 2260.96107784 61% => OK
No of words: 265.0 441.139720559 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17735849057 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93605893719 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.468620217663 129% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 705.55239521 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6158286487 57.8364921388 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4666666667 119.503703932 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.70786347227 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26697653285 0.218282227539 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808200558563 0.0743258471296 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126700040584 0.0701772020484 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109075183033 0.128457276422 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123531642308 0.0628817314937 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.3799401198 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.