The author represent the case of a television station. The business manage states that the decrease in the time devoted to weather and local news is having an adverse effect to the channel. Therefore, the channel should revert back to former timing. However the argument is not tenable as it lack fact and evidence. Furthermore, many assumptions have considered by the manager to project the decision.
The first problem with argument is that the author's vague terminology. The manager mentions that the program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. Author has not mentioned the exact time difference-2 hours or 10 min. Therefore, the effects of the decrease timing can be considered. Next the author states that most of the complaints received from viewers were concered with station's weather and local news.The author statement is ambigious as it is not having any exact fact or figure. May be only 10 complaints were reported and 3 of them were for weather and local news.
The argument is flawed by the author's assumptions. Author assumes that the complaints reported for station's weather and local news were owing to time allocation- there can be numerous reasons for the complaints. The complaints can be for the reporter of the program or because of the content of the show. The complaint can be because of the poor representation of minister of the city or the city. In addition to this assumption, the author goes on to assumes that the cancellation of adverstising contracts of the local businesses is because of the cut off in timing of weather and local news. There is a possibility that the relationship between the business and channel have degraded or the popularity of other channel have shifted the investement of businessman to a more popular channel.
The author conculed the argument by stating the increae i time devoted to weather and local news can compensated the loss of advertising revenue and attract viewers to the program. However the conculsion is based on fallacious logic. The relation between revenue, viewers and the time allocate to local news is not directly propotional.All faulty assumptions has lead to baseless conclusion. To bolster the argument the manager should have stated facts and figures to provide the relation between the complaints to time allocation and also decrease in viewers and revenue loss.
To recapulitate the author's argument is based on vague terminology, erroronous assumption. Furthermore, there is no specific fact or statistic to corroborate the claim. Hence the author's conculsion that former level of time devotion to weather and local news will enhnace the revenue and viewers of the program is incrediable
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Next the author states that most of the complaints received from viewers were concered with station's weather and local news.The author statement is ambigious as it is not having any exact fact or figure.
Error: news Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: concered Suggestion: concerned
Error: ambigious Suggestion: ambiguous
Sentence: In addition to this assumption, the author goes on to assumes that the cancellation of adverstising contracts of the local businesses is because of the cut off in timing of weather and local news.
Error: news Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: adverstising Suggestion: advertising
Sentence: There is a possibility that the relationship between the business and channel have degraded or the popularity of other channel have shifted the investement of businessman to a more popular channel.
Error: investement Suggestion: investment
Sentence: The author conculed the argument by stating the increae i time devoted to weather and local news can compensated the loss of advertising revenue and attract viewers to the program.
Error: increae Suggestion: increase
Error: conculed Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: However the conculsion is based on fallacious logic.
Error: conculsion Suggestion: conclusion
Sentence: The relation between revenue, viewers and the time allocate to local news is not directly propotional.All faulty assumptions has lead to baseless conclusion.
Error: news Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: propotional Suggestion: proportional
Sentence: To recapulitate the author's argument is based on vague terminology, erroronous assumption.
Error: recapulitate Suggestion: repudiate
Error: erroronous Suggestion: erroneous
Sentence: Hence the author's conculsion that former level of time devotion to weather and local news will enhnace the revenue and viewers of the program is incrediable
Error: news Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: enhnace Suggestion: enhance
Error: conculsion Suggestion: conclusion
Error: incrediable Suggestion: incredible
-------------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 447 350
No. of Characters: 2247 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.598 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.027 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.76 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 173 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 148 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 89 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.765 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.458 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.325 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.496 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.079 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'represents'.
Suggestion: represents
The author represent the case of a television station. The b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that the decrease in the time devoted to weather and local news is having an adv...
^^
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time devoted to weather and local news is having an adverse effect to the chann...
^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...el should revert back to former timing. However the argument is not tenable as it lack ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lacks'?
Suggestion: lacks
...wever the argument is not tenable as it lack fact and evidence. Furthermore, many as...
^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ed with stations weather and local news.The author statement is ambigious as it is ...
^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an be for the reporter of the program or because of the content of the show. The ...
^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nue and attract viewers to the program. However the conculsion is based on fallacious l...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c. The relation between revenue, viewers and the time allocate to local news is n...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: All
... local news is not directly propotional.All faulty assumptions has lead to baseless...
^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ctly propotional.All faulty assumptions has lead to baseless conclusion. To bolster...
^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d revenue loss. To recapulitate the authors argument is based on vague terminology,...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... or statistic to corroborate the claim. Hence the authors conculsion that former leve...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 11.1786427146 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 445.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14606741573 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85121873976 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413483146067 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 705.55239521 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1056452209 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4166666667 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5416666667 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20833333333 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338998217529 0.218282227539 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10406266107 0.0743258471296 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123885414731 0.0701772020484 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212396370713 0.128457276422 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918669270928 0.0628817314937 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 98.500998004 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.