Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
A picture is drawn to povide the promotion of Paleo diets in humans. But based on the given informations, a result can not be dragged indengeniously. A proper amount of questions also arised with the promotion. These qustion are listed below to rethink about the whole situation.
Firstly, is the paleo diet approved by doctor's? There is no evidence of that. A hypothesis of a healthier diet can not be promoted untill it is certified. There is no evidence of doctors/dietetians supporting this diet. A diet which is not authorized may trigger serious concern over the body as well as mind. Hence a diet can not be accepted and practised all of a sudden.
Secondly, Does bone broth actually the reason of fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases? It might be beace of the cooking style and the other ingrediants that are present but not credited. It might be seen been by research that bone broth has nothing to do with these dieases and some other ingredient might end up as the hero of this situation.
Thridly, the situation esteems that ingested carlilage can't replenish cartilage in knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. That means the consumption of cartilage and chondrotin does not guarentee the greater facility along with it. The whole situation might prompt towards a chemical anlysis and the data might show that any other chemical structure to end up winning the game.
Thridly and most precisely, If chronic illness was known to ancient humans and they act aginst it, why we are dealing with it till the 21st century? Isn't the patient of different chronic dieases increasing with time? Isn't the situation is grim than past? It might be seen by furthur reseach that ancient humans may adapted this diet beacsue of environemntal reasons like scarcity of vegetables and ignorence about farming and proper cooking. These diet might have end up for a very limited person and area where it suits the most.
Without having strong answers on the following questions, dragging a line can't be a wise decision. Hence all the points has to be taken to consideration otherwise proporising this diet might end up life threating to someone.
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 28 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 372 350
No. of Characters: 1783 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.392 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.793 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.617 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.317 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.261 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.261 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.049 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... concern over the body as well as mind. Hence a diet can not be accepted and practise...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tuation esteems that ingested carlilage cant replenish cartilage in knees or elbows ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Isn't
... dealing with it till the 21st century? Isnt the patient of different chronic diease...
^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Isn't
...t chronic dieases increasing with time? Isnt the situation is grim than past? It mig...
^^^^
Line 6, column 75, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...he following questions, dragging a line cant be a wise decision. Hence all the point...
^^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ragging a line cant be a wise decision. Hence all the points has to be taken to consi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 368.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95108695652 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75930715805 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3478946646 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2173913043 119.503703932 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.70786347227 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112534025719 0.218282227539 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320795536685 0.0743258471296 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286571849309 0.0701772020484 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543132513832 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330049221818 0.0628817314937 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.3799401198 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.3550499002 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.