People should not be misled by the advertising competition between Coldex and Cold-Away, both popular over-the-counter cold medications that anyone can purchase without a doctor's prescription. Each brand is accusing the other of causing some well-known, unwanted side effect: Coldex is known to contribute to existing high blood pressure and Cold-Away is known to cause drowsiness. But the choice should be clear for most health-conscious people: Cold-Away has been on the market for much longer and is used by more hospitals than is Coldex. Clearly, Cold-Away is more effective.
The author's claim about Cold-Away being more effective based on the above argument is quite absurd and contains a lot of flaws.The author suggests that Coldex and Cold-Away two popular medicine for countering cold, out the two Cold-Away is compartively better over Coldex. The arugument over which the author places his claim are flawed and cannot be used to make firm descions. The argument doesn't contains any scientific data and is based on generalised marketing stragies.
Coldex is known to contribute to existing high blood pressure and Cold-Away is known to cause drowsiness but these side effects are accusation from the other competitive brand and hence can't be trusted as a solid proof for comparsion and selecting a better medication, for instance a one popular energy drink company was accused by other for destroying natural glucose and producing harmful fatal disorders but on contrary it was found while testing that no such effects were observed and the company faked those accusations for commerical benefits. Hence these accusations without proofs cannot be a concerete evidence for comparision.
Also the author says that Cold-Away has been on the market for a much longer time and is used by more hospitals than Coldex is also an unfair reason to abate Coldex over Cold-Away. Since Coldex being new to the market might need some time to replace the old traditional of Cold-Away. There is also a possiblity that Cold-Away provides certain share of profit with the doctors who prescribe them, which results in more doctors and hospitals using them.Along with this there is a high passubilty that Cold-Away might be cheap and can be easily afforded. Also Coldex being late in the market holds a major possiblity of being developed after more research and hence can be more advanced than before existing medicines. But there is no suggestion from these arguments that one holds an edge over the other.
Therefore the author's assumption can be contradicted using basic logics and also more detailed study need to be suggested which includes scientfics tests to come to a conclusion that one of the medicine is better than the other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...uite absurd and contains a lot of flaws.The author suggests that Coldex and Cold-Aw...
^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...way is compartively better over Coldex. The arugument over which the author places ...
^^^
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d cannot be used to make firm descions. The argument doesnt contains any scientific...
^^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sed to make firm descions. The argument doesnt contains any scientific data and is bas...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...m the other competitive brand and hence cant be trusted as a solid proof for compars...
^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...se accusations for commerical benefits. Hence these accusations without proofs cannot...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... concerete evidence for comparision. Also the author says that Cold-Away has been...
^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... reason to abate Coldex over Cold-Away. Since Coldex being new to the market might ne...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Along
...n more doctors and hospitals using them.Along with this there is a high passubilty th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ht be cheap and can be easily afforded. Also Coldex being late in the market holds a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...at one holds an edge over the other. Therefore the authors assumption can be contradic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n edge over the other. Therefore the authors assumption can be contradicted using ba...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 353.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1104815864 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62421435387 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526912181303 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.103012933 57.8364921388 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.0 119.503703932 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0909090909 23.324526521 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305417914157 0.218282227539 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115795670403 0.0743258471296 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691981676987 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172408623436 0.128457276422 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617048805195 0.0628817314937 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.3799401198 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.