As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness and nausea, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all, contain chemicals that posed a health risk. This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods.
The author in the above argument defends the food can company Promofoods, It was alleged for causing dizziness and nausea and was tested. In the chemical test itwas found that samples of the recalled can, eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans and thus the author concluding that the canned products of Promofoods were safe for intake is quite absurd.
According to the author the other three chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods and were also found in the recalled cans of Promofood but the compartive quantity of these chemicals found in others and in Promofood products is not mentioned and hence we cannot clearly state that the complaints received of dizziness and nausea is vague, since it might be possible that the quantity found in Promofood cans are way more higher than the others. Author has also not taken into account that there might be difference in the intake of these products. It might be passuible case that Promofood cans contains products which are eaten in large quantity and hence the presence of the naturally occuring chemical responsible for dizziness and nausea is a problematic condition.
Along with it the author has also not taken into consideration that there can be an abnormal chemical causing this type of problems since the chemical test is done only for the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea and hence making the canned products of Promofoods unhealthy to eat.
Moreover the testing realiblity is also not clear in the argument as no statiscal data has been provided which shows the significance of the test conducted by the chemist and it might be a very possible case that the chemical responsible for the dizziness and nausea is generated over a period of time and the testing is done within few days of manufacturing and hence did not give enough time of the chemical reaction to happen which happens easily when the products are kept for sold and are used thereafter.
Therefore the author drawing the conclusion that the canned products are safe and the complaints hold not passiblity only on the basis of few chemical tests done by the chemist is incomplete and more data need to be provided to complety justify the argument
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...uantity found in Promofood cans are way more higher than the others. Author has also not ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ucts of Promofoods unhealthy to eat. Moreover the testing realiblity is also not clea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...izziness and nausea is generated over a period of time and the testing is done within few days...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...pt for sold and are used thereafter. Therefore the author drawing the conclusion that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 396.0 441.139720559 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92929292929 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53217233719 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 204.123752495 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 705.55239521 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.8473053892 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 135.031477812 57.8364921388 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 244.0 119.503703932 204% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.5 23.324526521 212% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.70786347227 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342266668045 0.218282227539 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170403455712 0.0743258471296 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816697554666 0.0701772020484 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205608973474 0.128457276422 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693164452559 0.0628817314937 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.5 14.3799401198 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 48.3550499002 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 12.197005988 184% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 12.3882235529 137% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.6 11.1389221557 194% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.9071856287 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.