A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
The statement was made on several unwarranted assumptions. I will discuss few of them in detail
For One, details on pets that can use this product is unclear, How often pets can be fed. these details were unclear to understand whether there was only a particular set of pets that were reactive to this product or there are several other reasons behind this complaints. Questions on are the feeding instructions communicated properly to ensure pets are not over fed and cause reactions. Irresponsible feeding during irregular intervals might affect the food cycle causing illness.
Nonetheless, there are questions on the entity that approved pet food. Test Environment was unclear. Testing agencies approvals can make the case more clear. No research data was published with regards to the concerns and complaints received from customers about the food. To understand are these symptoms harmful, periodic and pertinent to few species? Batch number of the production to be checked upon to understand if there is any process flaw that caused this mishap.
Furthermore, It is a known fact that external environments affect the way pets behave. Cross-breed pets attract a lot of attention from masses, Which are very sensitive to external conditions. Nutrition and environmental conditions are to be conditioned for their survival. Is it only during particular time of the season this complaints were noted has to be looked onto.
In conclusion, the statement is being challenged due to lack of information on pets that were tested. Chemicals that might cause reactions in particular species, Environmental conditions in which tests were conducted and approving body for this product.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... is unclear, How often pets can be fed. these details were unclear to understand whet...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... there are several other reasons behind this complaints. Questions on are the feedin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t affect the food cycle causing illness. Nonetheless, there are questions on the ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 339, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ymptoms harmful, periodic and pertinent to few species? Batch number of the produc...
^^
Line 8, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that caused this mishap. Furthermore, It is a known fact that external environ...
^^
Line 8, column 324, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ly during particular time of the season this complaints were noted has to be looked ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, nonetheless, so, as to, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 266.0 441.139720559 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39097744361 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94400990174 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593984962406 0.468620217663 127% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6058214629 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.625 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 23.324526521 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198814215945 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608571816488 0.0743258471296 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634046907593 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995019941468 0.128457276422 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661625854772 0.0628817314937 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.