The argument concludes that in order to increase the number of volunteers for charitable activities, Pleasantville High School should make it compulsory for all the students to complete 40 hours of community service. The argument is based on many assumptions and needs to be scrutinized efficiently.
Firstly, before taking any kind of action to nullify the decline in the number of volunteers, one should understand the reason behind the decrease. It might have happened that the school board might have increased the workload on students, due to which they are unable to opt for community service. The school hours might have increased or many students could be engaged in some sports or other extra-curricular activities. Compelling these students for community service would be restricting them from their area of interests. It could have happened that the awareness required among the students regarding social service is not up to the mark as it was before. Because of which students are not taking interest in social activities.
Secondly, it is important that social activities are done out of the will of a person and not by compelling them to do so. The students might not show the required interest for the activity and would do such things for the sake of it. Rather than directly including this program as a compulsion on the High School students, the School Board should think of starting small tasks right from the primary stages of education. It is important to develop interest of students in this service. Students might then find alternatives to circumvent such a compulsion.
Thus, the School Board should analyze the reason of decline and then take necessary action and also work for imbibing interests for these activities among the students from earlier stages of learning.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
minimum 3 arguments wanted.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 293 350
No. of Characters: 1480 1500
No. of Different Words: 141 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.051 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.713 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.667 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.357 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.363 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.555 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is not up to the mark as it was before. Because of which students are not taking intere...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents from earlier stages of learning.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 293.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17406143345 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79829765721 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 204.123752495 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1323040136 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.70786347227 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345551547607 0.218282227539 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110925401295 0.0743258471296 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764304814492 0.0701772020484 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2094958202 0.128457276422 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470769432754 0.0628817314937 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.3799401198 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.