"The population on Balmer Island increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island plans to limit the number of mopeds rented by each of the island&#03

The argument that the plan to limit the numbers of moped rented will successfully reduce the number of accidents in Balmer Island is not completely sound since it makes certain unwarranted assumptions. The plan carried out in Torseu may not be successful in Balmer.
First, the argument assumes an analogy that the resident of Balmer is as trained as the residents in Torseu in driving. Probably the Balmer island is loose in terms of issuing license due to which many untrained riders are present due to which the number of accidents is high in the case of Balmer.
Next, the argument assumes that moped accidents in Balmer caused due to the numbers of mopeds burgeoning on the island and neglects the possibility that the accidents are caused due to improper management of traffic signals in the street and less strict traffic rules due to which the residents violate the traffic rules. This may have led to more accidents on the island although the number of mopeds would be present in manageable numbers.
Similarly, the argument is based on the reports that don't have enough reliability as it doesn't necessarily need to be true that the accident was reduced in Torseu due to implementation reduction in a moped. Maybe the roads were made widen or any other new development plans in city traffic was brought due to which the accident had significantly slashed.
Finally, the argument makes a dogmatic assumption and neglects the possibility that all of the population already own the moped in advance and decreasing the number of mopeds was not going to affect the number of moped traffic on the island.
Thus, the argument is not logically convincing. The evidence to support the conclusion that implementing the exact same plan to limit the number of mopeds rented will considerably reduce the number of accidents in Balmer Island as it has done in Torseu does little to prove for the conclusion. Ultimately, The argument would have been strengthened if the author could have shown that both islands had drivers with equal riding experience, and the traffic rules were equally strict in both islands without disparity. Furthermore, it would have been strengthened if the author based is an argument on the fact that most of the people in Baler didn't own their own moped and the decrement of accidents in Torseu didn't have any other factors other than reducing the moped rentals.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e argument is based on the reports that dont have enough reliability as it doesnt ne...
^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...that dont have enough reliability as it doesnt necessarily need to be true that the ac...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ption and neglects the possibility that all of the population already own the moped in adv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 641, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e fact that most of the people in Baler didnt own their own moped and the decrement o...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 708, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nd the decrement of accidents in Torseu didnt have any other factors other than reduc...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, then, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 402.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95024875622 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6586256579 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435323383085 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.8229348151 57.8364921388 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.076923077 119.503703932 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9230769231 23.324526521 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360211718362 0.218282227539 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147260852926 0.0743258471296 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11569048233 0.0701772020484 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217818416694 0.128457276422 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910938401401 0.0628817314937 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.3799401198 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 98.500998004 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 406 350
No. of Characters: 1957 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.489 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.82 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.615 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.231 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.057 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.409 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.409 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5