Recently there have been discussions about ending Grove College s century old tradition of all female education by admitting male students into our programs At a recent faculty meeting a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation arguing th

Essay topics:

Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tradition of all-female education by admitting male students into our programs. At a recent faculty meeting, a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. However, Grove students, both past and present, are against the idea of coeducation. Eighty percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumnae who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Therefore, we recommend maintaining Grove College's tradition of all-female education. We predict that keeping the college all-female will improve morale among students and convince alumnae to keep supporting the college financially.

The recommendation made by the Grove College president and administration about whether to remain as a traditional all-female college or to get changed to co I education is being made to the college's governing committee. But this whole recommendation provided by the argurer as a anument is rife will alots of assumption only and it is very hard to built a concrete decision by assuming these information only.

Firstly, when the discusion reagding co-edution is carried out is not mention. It is at present senario or at the past. If its is past then at now this is not the case and will not support the recommendation. However if this is at present then it might be valid but still this will not be supportive as there are various other assumption that are not relevant to support this statement

Secondly, arugrer saya that majority of the faculty members but ther is not any exact number to support the decision it might be only be slightly higher taht the non supporter onces. Beside this, it is also not understood that just by introducint the co eduction how the students admission will get increased as there are various reason not to also. Such as the male or female students might not prefer the traditionally old all fermale college that is recently converted as the co-education institute rather choose those educatioinal centers that are traditionally a co-education ones. Hence, a cogent case can not be created due to the assumption made by the agument without any ralevant data

Thirdly, the college infrastruture also matters as there mujst be certain changes to the all female institute to make it co-ed ones. Also, there are various behavioural apoproaches and management teams that must be introduces to make it for both male and female which are very hard and take alot of time. Due to this also the admission of student might not be substantially increased.

Similarly, the case for the votes of students and alumane is not provided bold enough as the exact data is not revealed. And keepingt the traditon of all female education will improve morale among atudent is also not a sure thing as it depend on the behavioural approaches, attitude of stucent as well as management, the support from alumini also is the case that is only assumption, hence, this passage is full of assuption only,k

Votes
Average: 5.4 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...commendation provided by the argurer as a anument is rife will alots of assumptio...
^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...o built a concrete decision by assuming these information only. Firstly, when the discusion re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd will not support the recommendation. However if this is at present then it might be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'assumptions'?
Suggestion: assumptions
...e supportive as there are various other assumption that are not relevant to support this s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... by introducint the co eduction how the students admission will get increased as there a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ased as there are various reason not to also. Such as the male or female students mi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , k
..., this passage is full of assuption only,k
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, then, third, thirdly, well, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.6327345309 168% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 16.3942115768 134% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 395.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88607594937 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85762570599 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486075949367 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 705.55239521 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.5056850964 57.8364921388 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.461538462 119.503703932 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3846153846 23.324526521 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 5.70786347227 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165284191655 0.218282227539 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602187905506 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632205029463 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925792746886 0.128457276422 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470593270504 0.0628817314937 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.3799401198 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.3550499002 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 14 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 35 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 396 350
No. of Characters: 1891 1500
No. of Different Words: 192 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.461 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.775 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.814 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.182 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.867 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.326 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.59 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5