In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o

The above statement indicates that, the first study conducted by the University of Waymarsh is flawed. They have come to this conclusion based on the second study where each citizens in public libraries checked out the mystery novel. However, before this statement can be fully evaluated, there are certain things that needs to be explained by the author.
First of all, reading habits of people might differ from one another. In the first study, of Waymarsh citizens where respondents chose literary classics might be the students of history where the literary classic is one of the pivotal subject. For example, harry potter is considered as one of the very famous book in the world which happens to be literary classics. So myriad of citizens, might have choose it because it is very important for their subject also it is very ahead of it's time so people might have preferred that book in the first study. If either of these situation has some merit, then conclusion drawn in the original argument is significantly weakened.
Secondly, some people read book in order to kill the time and get rid of their banal life. The author in the argument prematurely stated the fact that respondents from the first study might have misrepresented their reading habits. Perhaps, mystery novels are considered to be one the very captivating. We can always take an example of one of the famous novel Rebecca which can be a good time pass when you're bored with your work. Hence, if the above statement is true then argument above doesn't hold any water.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed due to it's reliance on several unwarranted assumptions. If the author, is able to answer and clarify all the quandaries presented above and offer more evidence then it will be possible to fully evaluate the viability of the proposed study.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...sics. So myriad of citizens, might have choose it because it is very important for the...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'these situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; these situations
...t book in the first study. If either of these situation has some merit, then conclusion drawn i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...ecca which can be a good time pass when youre bored with your work. Hence, if the abo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e statement is true then argument above doesnt hold any water. In conclusion, the arg...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...presented above and offer more evidence then it will be possible to fully evaluate t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 2260.96107784 68% => OK
No of words: 314.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91082802548 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57023535524 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550955414013 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 705.55239521 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9901221016 57.8364921388 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.70786347227 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164272441659 0.218282227539 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562204946371 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744551967166 0.0701772020484 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920559645414 0.128457276422 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663182781543 0.0628817314937 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 316 350
No. of Characters: 1509 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.216 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.775 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.492 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.678 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.867 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.334 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.334 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5