Surely, there is no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. With, modernization and advancement in the technology,there are certain information that needs to be reconsidered again,and might be proven as erroneous. People have always been intrigued to analyze, about new ideas and information every now and then,which definitely help in emerging new theories. These sort of information and theories about anything would be capricious.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons why one should never rely on a piece of information in order to interpret the results. In other words, if we think pragmatically then, some information which are rational in recent times might be preposterous in future. For example, imminent and erudite scientist gave the theory of natural selection which was very correct according to this era, because people were not cognizant about anything as such, but now people have developed many theories which have counterattack darwin's theory. Similarly, many people in sixteenth and seventeenth century believed that
Earth was round, but later many astronomers studied about the planets and found out that Earth is oval. This information is valid for now, but can't be sure about it.
Subliminally, we tend to believe the things, that has been practiced by our ancesstors since ages without being skeptical about it. There are many orthodox culture which we still practiced in the name of traditions and values. Decades ago, people used to treat many diseases with the home remedies which certainly used to exacerbate instead of mitigating them. For example, for years people used to put mud in the wounds in order to ameliorate it, which actually used to worsen by waxing the number of bacteria in injuries. This kind of superstitions for diseases was practiced for years, because one of the 100 people during the treatment got cured with it. However, this scenario has changed with the advancement in the field of medical.
Moreover, information is something that is passed on generations to generations. In recent times, we could see that many people are believing that sun would live another billion years, which might be proven wrong with the new theories by other scientists in future.For example, there are many people who have been earning money and saving them for their grandchildren with this information.
To rebuttal, there are many points mentioned above that would buttress the given claim to be right. As we all are wary about the fact, with the change of era, many things and information we trust could take a turnover in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...zation and advancement in the technology,there are certain information that needs to b...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...tion that needs to be reconsidered again,and might be proven as erroneous. People ha...
^^^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...nalyze, about new ideas and information every now and then,which definitely help in emerging new t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...ideas and information every now and then,which definitely help in emerging new theorie...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'These nulls'?
Suggestion: This sort; These nulls
...finitely help in emerging new theories. These sort of information and theories about anyth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...l in recent times might be preposterous in future. For example, imminent and erudite scie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'counterattacked'.
Suggestion: counterattacked
...have developed many theories which have counterattack darwins theory. Similarly, many people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arwins theory. Similarly, many people in sixteenth and seventeenth century believ...
^^
Line 2, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th and seventeenth century believed that Earth was round, but later many astronom...
^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... This information is valid for now, but cant be sure about it. Subliminally, we ten...
^^^^
Line 4, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y used to worsen by waxing the number of bacteria in injuries. This kind of super...
^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nt times, we could see that many people are believing that sun would live another billion yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...th the new theories by other scientists in future.For example, there are many people who ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... theories by other scientists in future.For example, there are many people who have...
^^^
Line 6, column 218, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ormation we trust could take a turnover in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, then, for example, kind of, sort of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15801886792 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78529547912 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530660377358 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3936934511 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.105263158 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223217638288 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788048112629 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053065743352 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131318918595 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444513245901 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.