While the Department of Education in the state of Attra suggests that high school students be assigned homework every day, the data from a recent statewide survey of high school math and science teachers give us reason to question the usefulness of daily homework. In the district of Sanlee, 86 percent of the teachers reported assigning homework three to five times a week, whereas in the district of Marlee, less than 25 percent of the teachers reported assigning homework three to five times a week. Yet the students in Marlee earn better grades overall and are less likely to be required to repeat a year of school than are the students in Sanlee. Therefore, we recommend that all teachers in our high schools should assign homework no more than twice a week.
To the author this argument claims that our high school should assign homework no more than twice in a week. To justify the recommendation, the author cites the following facts. (1) A nationwide survey of high school math and science shows that singing homework daily is not useful. (2) in he distinct of Marlee, the students give better grade because teacher do not assign homework tree to five times a week. (3) We can use this suggestion, because it was successful in the Marlee. Scrutiny each of these factors, however, reveals that none of them lend credible supports to the recommendation.
First, base on the fact the a nationwide survey shows signing homework daily is usefulness in high school math and science, the author infers that it would be useful in all schools. However, it is not necessarily the case. Really, it is entirely possible that the survey’s result is very different in high school art and literature. So, there is not reasonable to generalize the result of a certain schools to all kinds of schools.
Second, the author relies on this assumption that students in Marlee gain better grades because of less signing homework. Nevertheless, students’ success were due to other factors such as the better teaching methods, more learning facilities, or even high educated teachers. In fact, in the district of Marlee; school may put new facilities at students’ disposal, which increase peoples’ grasp, like computers or advanced laboratory. Without considering this possible scenario, the author can not justifiably conclude that teachers should sign less students’ homework in a week.
In the third place, the author claims that we should run this plan in our high school, because the nation survey’s result. Nonetheless, it is quite possible the students in our high school be different of nation standards, and surely; running this suggestion can give different result in our high school.
In sum, the argument is flawed logically and therefore unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen the arguments, the author must provide clear information that nationwide reflects of our school. In order to assess the recommendation, we must know about all effective factors in students’ success in Marlee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ommendation. First, base on the fact the a nationwide survey shows signing homewor...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'in fact', 'such as', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272727272727 0.25644967241 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.102564102564 0.15541462614 66% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102564102564 0.0836205057962 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536130536131 0.0520304965353 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.037296037296 0.0272364105082 137% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.11655011655 0.125424944231 93% => OK
Participles: 0.013986013986 0.0416121511921 34% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.00529881836 2.79052419416 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.020979020979 0.026700313972 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0955710955711 0.113004496875 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.02331002331 0.0255425247493 91% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.002331002331 0.0127820249294 18% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2260.0 2731.13054187 83% => OK
No of words: 360.0 446.07635468 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27777777778 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.427777777778 0.378187486979 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.313888888889 0.287650121315 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222222222222 0.208842608468 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127777777778 0.135150697306 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00529881836 2.79052419416 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 207.018472906 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 54.9315297947 52.1807786196 105% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9473684211 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.11015272 57.7814097925 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.947368421 141.986410481 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 23.2022227129 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.724660767414 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 50.3362573099 51.9672348444 97% => OK
Elegance: 2.0843373494 1.8405768891 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505361746498 0.441005458295 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108332519118 0.135418324435 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0733597556062 0.0829849096947 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.558461628126 0.58762219726 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12123163053 0.147661913831 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210209816402 0.193483328276 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754813173731 0.0970749176394 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.36134628292 0.42659136922 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0766143808414 0.0774707102158 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358684340931 0.312017818177 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653392838685 0.0698173142475 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 6.46551724138 139% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.