Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Specific evidence about whether it would be possible for Paleans to have reached Lithos by other ways rather than by boat is needed to evaluate the argument. Also, knowing about other peoples in the region and whether they had boats is very important to check the argument's conclusion.
Consider the hypothesis in which Palean fossils or utensils, not necessarily the distinctive woven baskets, are found across the Brim River. This could prove Paleans found a way out of their village, across the river, without the need for boats, thus explaining the unique Palean baskets found in Lithos. Such a discovery would severely weaken the argument.
Also, what if other peoples, who used boats, lived in the vicinity of Palea village? These other peoples could have taken Paleans and their baskets across Brim River. This could also explain the discovery of the woven baskets in Lithos despite the absense of Palean boats. Finding fossils of other peoples in villages close to Palea, together with vestiges proving they used boats, would also weakens the argument.
To strengthen the argument, evidence proving no fossils or utensils of Paleans, of any kind, were found across Brim River: this would suggest they did not find any way out of Palea rather than by boat. Also, evidence that there were no other peoples using boats in the region, which could have taken them and their unique woven baskets across the river, is needed to support argument's conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...ad boats is very important to check the arguments conclusion. Consider the hypothesis ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'weaken'
Suggestion: weaken
...ges proving they used boats, would also weakens the argument. To strengthen the argu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
... across the river, is needed to support arguments conclusion.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 2260.96107784 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 241.0 441.139720559 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09128630705 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22917756659 2.78398813304 80% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50622406639 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 705.55239521 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.116561618 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.545454545 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 23.324526521 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.70786347227 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140478503205 0.218282227539 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665016988522 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376342775837 0.0701772020484 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953413405344 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340901808501 0.0628817314937 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 98.500998004 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.