Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The argument states that the woven baskets are made by palean people as they are found near the vicinity of the prehistoric village of the palean. But it need not be true because there is a possibility that the woven baskets are brought to village by the traders. There are various reasons for the basket to be present in that village not only the reason that they are made by the residents of palean. So there is no mandatory reason that some of the baskets found near the lithos is made by the paleon people itself they can be from the other places or made in the litho village itself.
Consider, the Brim river which is deep and broad becomes difficult for individual to cross the river. As a result may be the baskets have been developed in the village itself or traded from the neighboring villages. If we see in another way the woven baskets can be from the palean village and they can be transported through the toughest river Brim. This thesis leads to many possible outcomes.
Secondly, if we assume that there is no aquitance between the two villages so there is no chanse of trading between them. Here comes the question of how these baskets are brought near the litho village? which leads to a possibility of theft. we need to consider all of the possibilites. If we consider the case of archieologists their work is to discover the prehistoric things in the diging, near the old monuments etc.
Conclusively, I solemnly say that the woven baskets may belong the prehistoric village palean or it may not. There is a ambiguity in this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n. So there is no mandatory reason that some of the baskets found near the lithos is made b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...ets are brought near the litho village? which leads to a possibility of theft. we nee...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ets are brought near the litho village? which leads to a possibility of theft. we nee...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... which leads to a possibility of theft. we need to consider all of the possibilite...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ssibility of theft. we need to consider all of the possibilites. If we consider the case o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... village palean or it may not. There is a ambiguity in this situation. ...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20202020202 0.25644967241 79% => OK
Verbs: 0.161616161616 0.15541462614 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0774410774411 0.0836205057962 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.030303030303 0.0520304965353 58% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0538720538721 0.0272364105082 198% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.148148148148 0.125424944231 118% => OK
Participles: 0.037037037037 0.0416121511921 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5284366872 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.023569023569 0.026700313972 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.158249158249 0.113004496875 140% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.023569023569 0.0255425247493 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010101010101 0.0127820249294 79% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1675.0 2731.13054187 61% => OK
No of words: 278.0 446.07635468 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02517985612 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.57801047555 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31654676259 0.378187486979 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.23381294964 0.287650121315 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.125899280576 0.208842608468 60% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0827338129496 0.135150697306 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5284366872 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 207.018472906 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464028776978 0.469332199767 99% => OK
Word variations: 44.0012557177 52.1807786196 84% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.039408867 75% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5333333333 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7146923224 57.7814097925 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 141.986410481 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.466666666667 0.724660767414 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 41.9146282974 51.9672348444 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.57534246575 1.8405768891 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452327148803 0.441005458295 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146518911639 0.135418324435 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127301397021 0.0829849096947 153% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.599339224919 0.58762219726 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.193223842252 0.147661913831 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195961725884 0.193483328276 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109437877098 0.0970749176394 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371732411748 0.42659136922 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.102735575094 0.0774707102158 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295889570447 0.312017818177 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834434353508 0.0698173142475 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.33743842365 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.87684729064 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.82512315271 166% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 6.46551724138 15% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 14.657635468 41% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.