Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive design pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a “Palean” basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The author in the argument stated that woven basket characterised by a perticular design pattern and found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of palea.
Also the author stated that, archaeologists discovered the same palea baskets in Lithos, an ancient village acrosss a Brim River from palea.so the conclusion made by the author is that
Palean baskets were not uniquely palean since they were also found in Lathos.
In the first argument author only give emphasis on the village of Palea who contributed to the formation of Woven baskets.But, there may be chances that there could be another
ancient villages were thee who also the significantly contributed for the Woven basket so it is actually baseless and also author did not show any suffient proof for the only
people of Paleo
So overall the assumptions made by the author is baseless ans such assuptions will not consider.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... of the prehistoric village of palea. Also the author stated that, archaeologists ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he conclusion made by the author is that Palean baskets were not uniquely palean ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...buted to the formation of Woven baskets.But, there may be chances that there could ...
^^^
Line 11, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not show any suffient proof for the only people of Paleo So overall the ass...
^^^^
Line 13, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt proof for the only people of Paleo So overall the assumptions made by the a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 55.5748502994 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 2260.96107784 34% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 150.0 441.139720559 34% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17333333333 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 4.56307096286 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71780957554 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 204.123752495 42% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 705.55239521 35% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 19.7664670659 15% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 22.8473053892 219% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 125.592816497 57.8364921388 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 258.666666667 119.503703932 216% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.0 23.324526521 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.70786347227 280% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.218282227539 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0743258471296 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.128457276422 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.9 14.3799401198 194% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.73 48.3550499002 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 12.197005988 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32208582834 128% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 98.500998004 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 12.3882235529 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 11.1389221557 198% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.