1.Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you di

Essay topics:

1. Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

The author asserts that there are two diverse schools about the feature of a successful leader. While there is a group who believes that the important factor at the triumph of manager is his sense of competition; another group emphasizes the importance of cooperation. In what follows I will list the feasible reasons for both sides, and finally, I will mention my standpoint toward the issue.
The first category, which weighs the competition and rival as the main element of the success, seems considered the endless and chasm willing of the human being. It is a lucid fact that mankind never stops chasing his wishes, and there is no end for those wishes. In this scenario, the existence of rival for thriving and being a step further than others plan make that individual become successful. A lucid example which clarifies this logic is the competitive environment in the field of science. While all scientists and scholars are seeking to find the latest and updated version of exploration or invention, the ignorance of other achievements for presenting the updated and novel version will be a futile task. Since you do have no idea about the trending topic and other inventors’ achievements.
As mentioned, there is another school who believes that cooperation is more crucial than the competition. The possible reason for this preference could be the duty of the leader. A leader is a guy who provides a convenient platform for his team members to flourish their talents. In addition, he should provide a cogent interconnection between organs to share and exchange their data and knowledge until they reach the group’s aimed goal. In this case, the entity of the cooperation sense by the manager rears the group and facilitates their path for reaching success.
I should say that it is the second perspective with which I largely concur. First of all, from my point of you, the reason for which the second group relies on to support the idea is sensible and plausible. Furthermore, there is one more reason which outweighs the second school and it is the current interdisciplinary trends of work in modern life. According to the noteworthy refreshing data released by the Sociological Department in Tehran University, in the 2020s sixty-five percent of the occupancies possess multi-branches at the various fields which in the general views seems irrelevant; however, by this task, they link to each other. In this case, the knowledge over the entire areas by the leaders seems impossible. Consequently, by shaping the connection with expires of unknown fields and by collaboration with them the chance of success rises high.
To wrap it up, although the sense competition keeps to never stop, the cooperation is more important than it since it is teamwork and covers various vouge fields

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teamwork and covers various vouge fields
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, while, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2347.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06911447084 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89139482192 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535637149028 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8289113723 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.761904762 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191423158502 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542489780024 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381845051057 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927197114554 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439268424602 0.0667264976115 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.