4. Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
We are now living in an age of information and technology; we also now able to answer a lot of question about natural incidents which questions were hounding people from century to century. This development of science and technology is the result of researches. The mentioned prompt states that government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are ambiguous. I mostly stand against this statement. My position is based on two reasons against and one reason for the statement.
Firstly, consequences of a research is perspective, which depends on the understanding level of the personnel. Objectives of a research may be lucid to scientists but may not for government officials. For example, many American Physics lab are now collaborating for research of neutrino a mysterious particle of this universe. They are trying to developing a lab combinedly. If they can find the characteristics of this particle, could answer many unanswered question about this universe. For establishing, such lab will take billions of dollars. Now, government may not understand about the value of this research. Government may think it is a mere particle does not deserve much money. However, researchers know well what will be the consequences of this research if they can find out their intended results. If government does not agree to fund this research, some important question about this mysterious universe may remain mysterious.
Secondly, the research that may seem inconsequential at present may open the door for many effective scientific findings. For instance, atomic model of Rutherford, we know there are a lot of limitation of this model, but it is also true that the development of atomic model is started with this model. We all heard about a part of physics named quantum physics. This part of physics is abstruse to the lay people. Now we all know that this quantum physics is now capable to answer many vague question about the universe and it opened a door for a new technology called Nano-technology. If the researcher did not get the funding in these areas then it for sure that development in this field may not be possible.
However, we always have the paucity of money. A research need copious amount of money to proceed. It is not possible for a government to fund for all and any research. For example, during the pandemic of Corona virus the economy of the whole world plummeted. Therefore, it is obvious that government will not fund for the astronomy rather they will fund more in field of life science. Government has limitation: it can not provide funding for all and any research because of scarcity of resources.
In conclusion, this is a complex issue that government should or should not fund any research if it seems inconsequential because limitation in economy. However, for the development of science and world, funding is required for a research which may seem inconsequential today as this research may have the potential to open a new scope, a new world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... statement. Firstly, consequences of a research is perspective, which depends on the un...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06841046278 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00485352173 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442655935614 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 777.6 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6166922475 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8620689655 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1379310345 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48275862069 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 19.0 4.83258426966 393% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214711200922 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701713339148 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610756629139 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1459063555 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384098663257 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.