Today's generation is marked by technological wonders that have led to significant improvements in efficiency and speed at which products are manufactured. While historically most industrial machines have supplanted manual efforts, the prompt questions whether the human brain is superior to machines or is it the opposite. The concept of machines is a product of human innovation and as such corrobates the idea the human mind is superior, but most complex calculations and tasks are better performed and more efficiently done by the machines than humans today. In my opinion, I mostly disagree that human minds will always be superior to machines because these are tools developed by mankind, while arguing that definitively, all advancements to machines and such tools will be a product of the intellectual vastness of man.
The very first embodiment of machine, still used today, is a calculator. While humans could historically make numeric calculations, the advent of such an electronic tool made it easy to perform complex ones with ease and efficiency. Thus the tool is indisputably superior to the human mind in such a case and serves to be auxiliary in that it helps individuals to take on more complicated tasks, rather than doing petty calculations on pen and paper. Several advancements of the calculator such as computers and autonomous robots, all products of human imagination and innovation, have shown superiority in term of doing tasks which were earlier deemed as arduous for humans. This directly contrasts the prompts that human minds will irrefutably sustain its dominance in all aspects simply because all machines are man-made.
Furthemore, the advent of new technological approaches in order to reduce human error have led to establishment of engineering challenges such as "Deep Leaning", "Machine Learning", and "Computer Vision". Such key paradigm shifts show how the entire scientific and engineering community is convinced that machines can effectively surpass human mind and reduce the errors that are most predominant to human judgement. Had it been that machines were always inferior to perform tasks as compared to humans, the whole effort put to developing such technologies would be a waste of resources and talent. As such, technologies such as "Internet of Things" and "Computer Vision" are based on the ideas that if machines can be made to work similar to human brains then they would substantially solve problems most relevant to today's society such as weather predictions, car accidents, among others.
Arguably, all machines today have been developed and modified by humans at some point in time. Hence the intellectual capabilities of mankind knows no bounds in finding better solutions that make tasks easier and faster. However, the key motive behind such endeavours is because people are limited in their abilities to perform such tasks at high speed. Being aware of the limitations of humanity call forth the developement of resources that substantially augment the jobs of the people while adhering to market and societal demands. Hence, while machines are obviously superior in performing tasks, the answer to the question as to whether they can be as intelligent as humans is evident in that all machines serve as tools that augment people's effort and also need manual supervision for maintenance. Thus intellectually humans have and will always be superior to machines. However, in performing tasks machines are superior to the human brain.
In conclusion, today's machines are impeccably accute and help in performing complex jobs that are deemed either dangerous or difficult for mankind. Hence these machines are no doubt superior to the human mind in that they are capable of achieving results much faster. As evidenced throughout history, all embodiments of machines have evolved as a solution to break the human limits. However, what is certain is that intellectually mankind will always hold its dominion and be superior than machines in its endeavours.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... complex ones with ease and efficiency. Thus the tool is indisputably superior to th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...dified by humans at some point in time. Hence the intellectual capabilities of mankin...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 615, Rule ID: WHETHER[2]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...rior in performing tasks, the answer to the question as to whether they can be as intelligent as humans is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 804, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eed manual supervision for maintenance. Thus intellectually humans have and will alw...
^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...her dangerous or difficult for mankind. Hence these machines are no doubt superior to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...lways hold its dominion and be superior than machines in its endeavours.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3432.0 2235.4752809 154% => OK
No of words: 634.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41324921136 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01790360848 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09325095889 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470031545741 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 1086.3 704.065955056 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.768122732 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294838857968 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104816095482 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679855106081 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200981910623 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623759461262 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 172.0 100.480337079 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... complex ones with ease and efficiency. Thus the tool is indisputably superior to th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...dified by humans at some point in time. Hence the intellectual capabilities of mankin...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 615, Rule ID: WHETHER[2]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...rior in performing tasks, the answer to the question as to whether they can be as intelligent as humans is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 804, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eed manual supervision for maintenance. Thus intellectually humans have and will alw...
^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...her dangerous or difficult for mankind. Hence these machines are no doubt superior to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...lways hold its dominion and be superior than machines in its endeavours.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3432.0 2235.4752809 154% => OK
No of words: 634.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41324921136 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01790360848 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09325095889 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470031545741 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 1086.3 704.065955056 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.768122732 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294838857968 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104816095482 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679855106081 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200981910623 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623759461262 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 172.0 100.480337079 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.