62. The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. Indisputably, due to the fast development of artificial intelligence, machine can learn like a child, and can precisely tell the difference between the photos of cats and dogs. Hence, people are scared that the artificial intelligence will be superior to human in some day of the future. Nevertheless, I believe that the machine will only be tools of human minds, because it’s constructed by human, thus no matter how brilliant the computer is, we can still remain fully control of the machines. Therefore, I generally disagree with the opinion that the machines will be superior to human mind, and would argue that machines are only tools of human minds.
First of all, I do think that the machines are great tools for human being. I would like to point out that the it makes our life more convenient, through spending less time on lots of trivial things. To illustrate, let us took at the example of the application of machine learning on almost every field. In those day which machine learning is not mature enough for application, if a grocery store wants to know what customers prefer, they had to do a lot of survey, such as dialing the phone call or doing some questionnaire survey, which is costly on labor costs. However, nowadays grocery store only needs to put the raw data into the machine and the machine can output a model and predict that which products do customers favor. In the circumstance, we can observe that although the machine is brilliant enough to estimate what customers prefer, still, without the data, the machine can’t do the work, which means human can decide whether to input the data or not. Consequently, it is obvious that the machine can only be a tool for human, rather than dominating us.
But it’s also worth considering that the machines growing intelligence will dominate us at someday. Specifically, for machines learning have the ability to tell the difference in difference things, in other words, the machines have the ability to capture the feature on photos, and categorize them to different clusters. A good case would be machines have the ability to tell differences between cats and dogs, woman and man. Furthermore, machines can use the feature it captures from the photos to reproduce another human photos or animal photos. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that by the speed of growing intelligence of machines, we need to be cautious about the development of machines. Hence, all the evidence demonstrates that if we be cautious about how we manipulate the machines, it will eventually be the greatest tools of human being.
In conclusion although machines are only tools of human minds, but the intelligence of the machines potential to surpass us. As long as some measurements are performed, or some area involved, if we carefully input the data and observe how the machines developed, the machine can be a great tool for human. In fact, provide a harmony relation between human and machines.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
...ificial intelligence, machine can learn like a child, and can precisely tell the dif...
^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...n being. I would like to point out that the it makes our life more convenient, through...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'those days'?
Suggestion: this day; those days
...hine learning on almost every field. In those day which machine learning is not mature en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun survey seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of surveys'.
Suggestion: a lot of surveys
...w what customers prefer, they had to do a lot of survey, such as dialing the phone call or doin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...ay. Specifically, for machines learning have the ability to tell the difference in d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2612.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95635673624 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72607838699 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457305502846 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 832.5 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7941153558 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.380952381 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0952380952 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328630476126 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123992206648 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09606582832 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226958965506 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809994275799 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
...ificial intelligence, machine can learn like a child, and can precisely tell the dif...
^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...n being. I would like to point out that the it makes our life more convenient, through...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'those days'?
Suggestion: this day; those days
...hine learning on almost every field. In those day which machine learning is not mature en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun survey seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of surveys'.
Suggestion: a lot of surveys
...w what customers prefer, they had to do a lot of survey, such as dialing the phone call or doin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...ay. Specifically, for machines learning have the ability to tell the difference in d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2612.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95635673624 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72607838699 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457305502846 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 832.5 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7941153558 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.380952381 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0952380952 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328630476126 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123992206648 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09606582832 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226958965506 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809994275799 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.