As acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
The claim is untenable in my opinion, in that it fails to clear out the logic of acquiring knowledge and complexible things. The assertation describes the process of learning as a way to complex commonplaces even more mysterious. Although some research areas in certain subjects seem surprising in the view of layperson, its implication is not easy for they to find out, making their censory more irresponsible.
Admittedly, some critics averring people in cer tain research areas acquring knowledge to make the world more mysterious are understandable, because from a layperson's view, it is easy to be cheated by some studies common appearence. For example, in the world of mathematics, a tough but seemingly anomalous problem--why ties of shoes automatically get loose--is widely studied by multiple mathematicians. Although it seems ridiculous for accept the fact that researchers studying in high-class universities are acctually studying a minuscule commonality like that, and they might consider no pragmatic meaning of such study, the research's implication is never limited on this specific question only, its result may be confusing and travial, but the methodology it used, the thinking it took are far more contributing to the literiture of math study. Thus, some study seemingly making easy problems confusing is acctually meaningful for relative region studiers, but cryptic for layperson.
Except certain special example I have mentioned before, it is difficult to say that acquiring knowledge is making our world more complex. Whatever area we look at, they must experience a long time development to where they currently stand.
Machine learning, a cross-discipline recently being extremely popular, is focusing on how to make machines to understand people's commands and execute them. While some commands that are understood by machines are pretty conspicuous for a person to understand and do, the way to accomplish such achievement is very technique-based--knowledge of math, physics, engineering and computer science are inevitably requried. So such a knowledge-requiring discipline should have had a shadow and dark future if we use the logic of the claim, but why does it attracts so many experts in disparate areas to corroborate together to build up labs? I believe it is its huge and promising potential, by researching on ML, algorithms become better so that our lives, which based on the Internet, will become more "AI".
In sum, although some critics' censories regarding some ostensible easy research are understandable, scientists in our world are trying to stand on giant should to explore more unknown area in order to bring us a better life. Thus, I assert that every study on the world, as long as they are original, is beneficial for our lifves and trying to sove tough p
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attract'?
Suggestion: attract
...the logic of the claim, but why does it attracts so many experts in disparate areas to c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attract'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: attract
...the logic of the claim, but why does it attracts so many experts in disparate areas to c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, regarding, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36486486486 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30437567906 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578828828829 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9567491059 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.8 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213923369887 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768793059386 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760400562351 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130618904389 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587265119783 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attract'?
Suggestion: attract
...the logic of the claim, but why does it attracts so many experts in disparate areas to c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attract'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: attract
...the logic of the claim, but why does it attracts so many experts in disparate areas to c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, regarding, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36486486486 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30437567906 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578828828829 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9567491059 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.8 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213923369887 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768793059386 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760400562351 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130618904389 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587265119783 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.