An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
The statement contends to say that by analyzing the doctor's record of treating similar afflicted patients, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. I agree to the above statement as it is very necessary for a patient to be aware about the doctor’s medical history that can help him/her to be persistent about the decision to get treated by that particular doctor or not.
The above statement can be proven by considering some hypothetical and empirical examples. In today's world, there are a lot of cases concerned with the artfulness of many doctors that conceive the patients to be treated in their way which turns out to be much more costly and the results obtained may not be appropriate. Some of the doctors tend to be avaricious and their only objective is to get the maximum penny out of the victim's pocket.
There are many cases registered that relates the issue of fake doctors operating because of their mutual benefits or in order to live a hedonistic life. It is very easy to get an invalid graduation certificate that can be used as an identity to show that he/she is real doctor. Many of the patients gets deceived by this invalid degree and accepts the terms and conditions of the doctor to be treated in their particular way.
A TV series named "Savadhan India" broadcasted in India, shows much of these cases. The TV series is designed in order to enlighten the denizens to be circumspect regarding these kind of cases. In order to avoid such kind of situation India grants each of its citizen to ask about the doctor's record of treating that particular ailment, he/she is suffering from. As a result, the number of cases concerning this critical issue have been reduced substantially.
Therefore, an ailing patient should have access to the doctor's record of treating similar afflicted patients that can help the patient to be decisive. Furthermore by receiving such access, the suffering patient may accurately determine whether the doctor has the potential to treat that medical condition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...esults obtained may not be appropriate. Some of the doctors tend to be avaricious and their...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...he denizens to be circumspect regarding these kind of cases. In order to avoid such kind o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...at can help the patient to be decisive. Furthermore by receiving such access, the suffering...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00857142857 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77455640874 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6280995592 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.214285714 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440267177422 0.243740707755 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162611904609 0.0831039109588 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183491392519 0.0758088955206 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280167011591 0.150359130593 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217147526613 0.0667264976115 325% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.