Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The above statement contends to say that since there is a small probability of a person dying as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered. The above statement does not depict the exact amount of people dying because of cow flu. Moreover, they explicitly claimed of having low probability of a person dying because of cow flu. However, claiming a critical sentence needs manifestation by an authority and there is no mention of such in the above claim.
The report mentions about the areas where the disease is detected. However, it doesn't specifically states that in which areas the investigation carried out. How many people were actually a part of that investigation. If the investigation carried out considered a thousands of people than this issue might turn out to be serious and the conclusions made in the claim might have turned out to be the opposite. Therefore, the report should provide exact amount of figures so that conclusions made seems coherent.
Secondly, it is mentioned that there are fewer chances of a person dying because of cow flu but this claim is not supported by any governmental organization. Therefore, this statement should be something to be dubious about. It requires further verification by professional doctors and researchers. It might turn out to be the opposite. A person may have several chances of dying because of the cow flu thereby rescinding the claim.
If the precautions are taken before hand than it might not lead to a condition were people may die because of cow flu. Based upon a possibility that is claimed by the report having improper manifestations this issue cannot be dismissed. Therefore, the report lacks sufficient amount of data and figures leading to raise qualms regarding its accuracy.
It can be concluded that the above statement is something to be dubious about and needs further investigation with accurate reports, data and figures under the guidance of appropriate professionals. Therefore, we cannot rely upon the conclusion stated above that might lead to a noxious disease leading to a flagrant situation.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 351 350
No. of Characters: 1759 1500
No. of Different Words: 160 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.328 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.011 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.929 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 48 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.474 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.843 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.684 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.546 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...re the disease is detected. However, it doesnt specifically states that in which areas...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'a thousand'
Suggestion: a thousand
...he investigation carried out considered a thousands of people than this issue might turn ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a thousand' or simply 'thousands'?
Suggestion: a thousand; thousands
...he investigation carried out considered a thousands of people than this issue might turn ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
... claim. If the precautions are taken before hand than it might not lead to a condition w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...d than it might not lead to a condition were people may die because of cow flu. Base...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 350.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02082026973 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462857142857 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8915981544 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0526315789 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.20758483034 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318043541302 0.218282227539 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991386150484 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858054603776 0.0701772020484 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167756563988 0.128457276422 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064675206402 0.0628817314937 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.