An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
An ailing patients has all the rights on the Earth to decide who he/she wants to be treated by whether a doctor who is a renowned professional in his/her field or the one who has high success rates. But making this decision based on having an easy access to the doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients is not valid on the part of the patients' records who wants to keep it confidential. The same ailing patient would have issues if his/her record is available to anyone, in a way diminishing his/her right of freedom. If a person is suffering from a life-threatening disease , say cancer, and doesn't want her young kids or relatives to know about her ailment, she would be highly distressed if her reports where available to anyone who wanted to access it. The patient's case is highly confidential between the doctor and the patient. If the patients are volunteering willing to share their records to anyone or some other patient, it would be advisable that they sign a non-objectionable certificate to avoid any mishaps in future.
Let's consider a situation where a doctor has 99% successful rate in treating a certain type of disease, but this doesn't assure the patient that he will be 100% successful in treating her completely. It is quite possible that even though she is suffering from the same ailment but the degree of severity is too high in her case compared to all the cases the doctor has dealt till date. Hence, it is a wrong way to measure the doctor based on the record of previous patients that he has treated. In fact, one needs to instil his/her faith in the doctor that he would be successful and try every little thing under his professional knowledge to save or treat the patient in the best possible was, because in most cases, the doctor is the only option the patient has.
There are many other different ways in which a doctor can be considered suitable by the patient to treat him/her, which may include the years of practice the doctor has in his field- which implies that he has dealt with a wide array of ailments of varying degrees. One other way, instead of accessing the records of previous patients would be to personally meet the patients. The patients would be sympathetic as well as empathetic while discussing what they feel about the doctor and also about the ailment that they are or were suffering. In this modern era thanks to the social networking sites, it has become quite easy to contact people- the patients.
On the other side, there are some advantages of easy access to the doctor's record of treating similarly ailing patients to his/her potential patients provided the name of the patients treated is kept completely anonymous when the information is shared. This helps to make a comprehensive analysis about the ailment as well as the doctor. The sharing of the record can also be helpful to potential future doctors, researchers and other doctors working in the same field.
Keeping the confidentiality of the patient in mind, and also to help other patients, doctors, researchers, and other having a keen interest, easy access of records of previous patients can be made available considering both the pros and cons in mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'patient'?
Suggestion: patient
An ailing patients has all the rights on the Earth to deci...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
An ailing patients has all the rights on the Earth to decide w...
^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...ut making this decision based on having an easy access to the doctors record of treating simil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 590, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uffering from a life-threatening disease , say cancer, and doesnt want her young k...
^^
Line 1, column 609, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e-threatening disease , say cancer, and doesnt want her young kids or relatives to kno...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1037, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...onable certificate to avoid any mishaps in future. Lets consider a situation where a d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...cate to avoid any mishaps in future. Lets consider a situation where a doctor has...
^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing a certain type of disease, but this doesnt assure the patient that he will be 100%...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'as well as', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228040540541 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.168918918919 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109797297297 0.0880659088768 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0337837837838 0.0497285424764 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0405405405405 0.0444667217837 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113175675676 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0557432432432 0.0406280797675 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66750175223 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0405405405405 0.030933414821 131% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121621621622 0.0997080785238 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0185810810811 0.0249443105267 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0202702702703 0.0148568991511 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3200.0 2732.02544248 117% => OK
No of words: 553.0 452.878318584 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78661844485 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349005424955 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251356238698 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.164556962025 0.200843997647 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0904159132007 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66750175223 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 219.290929204 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45027124774 0.48968727796 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.0806552856 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.7222222222 23.380412469 131% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.094735468 59.4972553346 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.777777778 141.124799967 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7222222222 23.380412469 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 55.857846092 51.4728631049 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.63194444444 1.64882698954 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467450270825 0.391690518653 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.154112066241 0.123202303941 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0875272977329 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.630304161012 0.547984918172 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139930181573 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220497952863 0.161403998019 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066414018396 0.0892212321368 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.547944081365 0.385218514788 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.045667285367 0.0692045440612 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327419045911 0.275328986314 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812507998622 0.0653680567796 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.