All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Generally, multinational companies hire consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. It is of the belief that if the same companies were to spend more time, instead of more money, listening to their own employees, the consultants would be unnecessary. But, it fails to identify the true need a consultant, who gathers years of expertise in the particular field. The consultants are the best at their job and their only job is to come with a solution which is for sure suppose to give results. The solutions provided by these consultants are based on years of research work and real world examples that the common employees might not even be aware about. The employees of the firm are not inherited naturally and it is unlikely for them to come to a decision unanimously to increase the efficiency of the firm even if they are know the firm they are working with entirely.
Consultants are well versed with specific ways of dealing with problems and are henceforth, rewarded for the unique solutions they come up with that is uniquely faced by the company. They provide with an unbiased opinion to the board and the final decision stands in the hands of the board members whether to implement the same or not. Consultants have an all new and different way to approach a problem. Moreover, they provided an outside opinion which is more often than not biased, based on clear cut facts and figures. Hiring consultants can in a way help save time, where in the employees can focus on other important tasks.
Some people might think that hiring consultants is unnecessary. They are definitely true, when they may be small cost-effective terms who do not have high profits, and hence cannot afford consultants. Smaller firms can also have an innovative team set up that would any day be cheaper from the consultants to work on the issue of operating efficiently.In such situations, if the companies spend more time listening to their own employees it can act in the companies' advantage mainly because in smaller firms the employees are well informed about all the different departments and the mutual co-existence between the departments. Hence, helping to save money and increasing the operating efficiency of the firm.
In the end, there are many factors that needs to be dealt with to justify the hiring of consultants, which is the sizeof the firm and the employees awareness about the co-existence of different departments. Both the ways can be beneficial in different situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 683, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mployees might not even be aware about. The employees of the firm are not inherited...
^^^
Line 1, column 855, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...efficiency of the firm even if they are know the firm they are working with entirely...
^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...k on the issue of operating efficiently.In such situations, if the companies spend...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...s, which is the sizeof the firm and the employees awareness about the co-existence of dif...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20697167756 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.176470588235 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0980392156863 0.0880659088768 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0544662309368 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0348583877996 0.0444667217837 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113289760349 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0457516339869 0.0406280797675 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86834123849 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0392156862745 0.030933414821 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00435729847495 0.0016655270985 262% => OK
Determiners: 0.119825708061 0.0997080785238 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0239651416122 0.0249443105267 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0174291938998 0.0148568991511 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2519.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 422.0 452.878318584 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9691943128 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.305687203791 0.366273622748 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.260663507109 0.280924506359 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.206161137441 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154028436019 0.132149295362 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86834123849 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485781990521 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 53.5783177734 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8235294118 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.2503335897 59.4972553346 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.176470588 141.124799967 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.674092028746 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 50.8898801227 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.37704918033 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425932468498 0.391690518653 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13496544156 0.123202303941 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0822939015103 0.077325440228 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.534749790403 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.194882654421 0.149214159877 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187507722593 0.161403998019 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156653939213 0.0892212321368 176% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.543609547793 0.385218514788 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0389411340423 0.0692045440612 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304968673506 0.275328986314 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106249349057 0.0653680567796 163% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.