Techno Corporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with current satellite provider. The company is Techno Corporation. A consumer survey last year indicated that over eighty percent of the respondents were dissatisfied with the current satellite television provider and would want to switch to another provider if the industry were not monopoly.Thus, the new venture of Techno Corporation into satellite television will prove to be highly profitable for those who invest now.
The newsletter urges the investors to make investment in Techcorporation, a new company that has developed satellite technology which is approved by the FTA to compete with the current satellite provider for the first time in ten years. There are many issues to be raise and many other clarifications that the investors would like to deal with before making an investment even worth of a penny.
First of all, the investor would like to know whether the hew company is private or public supported, figuring the amount of risk that they are taking. Secondly, the investors would be too keen in knowing how they are completely assured that the company would do well, or go bankrupt. Is the technology that they have developed really worth the investment? The investor would want to know how much investment needs to be made in order to have or what share must he/she have to have guaranteed profits. Finally, after what duration of time will the revenues breakeven? What if the company gets bankrupt mid-way? Then, who is willing to take the responsibilities about the new company? A lot of questions are posed in the investors mind before coming to the conclusion whether their investments are worth or not.
The nest thing that props up in anyone’s mind is that the survey stated represents the opinion of all the people of the area or not. Because if it is the opinion of just a handful of people, the investment is not worth the risk at all. Even after considering the survey to be valid, are the people going to be satisfied with change? Or is it that the people just wants to get rid of the old provider, and are not satisfied with the new one either? The answers to all these questions play a pivotal role in making the decision of the investor.
If the answers to all these turn out to be total positive, which would guarantee the success of the TechCorp, then there is no harm in making any investment in the firm as the new venture of TechCorp into satellite television is bound to prove to be highly profitable to all those who invest now. On the contrary, even if there is no proper answer to some of the questions, then the investor is put in a trap and won't be in a state to make a comprehensive and valid decision about the future of his/her investments. Therefore, it is highly advisable to look into the matter at depth before making any decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the investor would like to know whether the hew company is private or public supported,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...order to have or what share must he/she have to have guaranteed profits. Finally, af...
^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'revenues'' or 'revenue's'?
Suggestion: revenues'; revenue's
...y, after what duration of time will the revenues breakeven? What if the company gets ban...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y, even if there is no proper answer to some of the questions, then the investor is put in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.197826086957 0.25644967241 77% => OK
Verbs: 0.182608695652 0.15541462614 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0673913043478 0.0836205057962 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0521739130435 0.0520304965353 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0152173913043 0.0272364105082 56% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128260869565 0.125424944231 102% => OK
Participles: 0.05 0.0416121511921 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67208928398 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.05 0.026700313972 187% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00434782608696 0.001811407834 240% => OK
Determiners: 0.139130434783 0.113004496875 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0173913043478 0.0255425247493 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0239130434783 0.0127820249294 187% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2377.0 2731.13054187 87% => OK
No of words: 423.0 446.07635468 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61938534279 6.12365571057 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.57801047555 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.286052009456 0.378187486979 76% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.217494089835 0.287650121315 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156028368794 0.208842608468 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118203309693 0.135150697306 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67208928398 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 207.018472906 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470449172577 0.469332199767 100% => OK
Word variations: 51.4624165673 52.1807786196 99% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.039408867 90% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5 23.2022227129 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9940473378 57.7814097925 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.055555556 141.986410481 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.2022227129 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.724660767414 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 45.2494089835 51.9672348444 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.50434782609 1.8405768891 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440519323797 0.441005458295 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.17310893174 0.135418324435 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0878770376754 0.0829849096947 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.61318681235 0.58762219726 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150988787627 0.147661913831 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209161970729 0.193483328276 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109020038786 0.0970749176394 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.573435813909 0.42659136922 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0342889166891 0.0774707102158 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354790392501 0.312017818177 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810642864332 0.0698173142475 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.33743842365 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 6.46551724138 139% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.