Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
With the advent of internet and the ease with which communication to any person around the globe has become possible, brings some negative aspects along with comforting our lives. For example, an unintentional mail sent to someone, surely cannot be retrieved back, in fact can additionally be used against the sender as an evidence that could be justified in a lawsuit proving that the email was meant to harm the reputation of the receiver or had hidden malicious intents. Moreover, the lawsuit costs the sender and the firm he/she is working for tons of money.
Such a situation more often warns the company management to ensure a strict and disciplined work environment in the company, in order to save the company from disgrace and heavy lawsuits. Preventive measures that may conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence may thwart the employees from doing a sort of illegal work or corruption that could end up in severe repercussions. A certain extent of check is mandatory on the part of the firm because if they fail to do so, and trust their employees a lot, there could possibly a rat within them corrupting the entire system and never having the threat of being caught. More likely, the rat is quite capable of corrupting other employees to work against the firm for selfish reasons. The firm is responsible for keeping all its employees under check.
Keeping the work of each and every employee under surveillance is quite a tedious and next to impossible job, as any worker may at any point of time sneak out or fool the surveillance. Hence, e-mail and phone records could help to keep a check on any conversation the employee makes to anyone be it inside or outside the firm. Any work done by the employee which is remotely related to the firm could easily put the firm in jeopardy, probably ending in a lawsuit. In order to reduce the waste of resources such as time and the system capacity, the company could design a system where all the mail correspondences be checked regularly and stored at a place in order to be retrieved at any time in future.
On the contrary, some employees may argue that having a constant check about the doing of them could in a way invade their privacy and reflect the lack of trust the company has in them. The company needs to assure the employees that by doing so they are in no way harming the employee or their privacy, it is just a company policy that they need to follow in order to save the company's reputation. Moreover, the company can carry out their surveillance task sneakily, without disturbing or letting the employees know about their routine monitoring. Well, any case of misconduct on the part of any employee could be dealt in a harsh manner, making other employees cognizant about the consequences of treachery.
Finally, employee surveillance is a must for the company as it may employee hundreds to millions of employees and to trust each and every one is nothing but foolish. Checking email sent to customers or any other person could only be advantageous to the company so as to ensure that no employee is acting against the company and avoid huge lawsuits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... and trust their employees a lot, there could possibly a rat within them corrupting the entire...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...nversation the employee makes to anyone be it inside or outside the firm. Any work...
^^
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ce in order to be retrieved at any time in future. On the contrary, some employees may...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 622, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harsh manner" with adverb for "harsh"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...the part of any employee could be dealt in a harsh manner, making other employees cognizant about...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
...s to millions of employees and to trust each and every one is nothing but foolish. Checking email ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...uld only be advantageous to the company so as to ensure that no employee is acting again...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'in fact', 'sort of', 'such as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246153846154 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0598290598291 0.0880659088768 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0393162393162 0.0497285424764 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0273504273504 0.0444667217837 62% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135042735043 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0581196581197 0.0406280797675 143% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67383523547 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0358974358974 0.030933414821 116% => OK
Particles: 0.00512820512821 0.0016655270985 308% => OK
Determiners: 0.14358974359 0.0997080785238 144% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0307692307692 0.0249443105267 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102564102564 0.0148568991511 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3157.0 2732.02544248 116% => OK
No of words: 546.0 452.878318584 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78205128205 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.327838827839 0.366273622748 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24358974359 0.280924506359 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.164835164835 0.200843997647 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106227106227 0.132149295362 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67383523547 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 219.290929204 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465201465201 0.48968727796 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.9973134905 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.3333333333 23.380412469 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6706060206 59.4972553346 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.388888889 141.124799967 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.380412469 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 54.6923076923 51.4728631049 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.99224806202 1.64882698954 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387616436139 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146019242464 0.123202303941 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0598279290083 0.077325440228 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.633790628859 0.547984918172 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.107162445977 0.149214159877 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170979860973 0.161403998019 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673469353173 0.0892212321368 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.470644183706 0.385218514788 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0551066323768 0.0692045440612 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264403301368 0.275328986314 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488274100473 0.0653680567796 75% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.