An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patient.Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the medical condition.
With the availability of online tools which help diagnose illnesses and understand their details, the access to information of a doctor's record may seem like a basic right of an ailing patient. however, using this information to decide the doctor's competency to treat a patient can sometimes come in the way of patient's right to good treatment and be detrimental to the patient themselves.
doctors are trained proffessionals, who have acquired their knowledge through years of study and practice. Expecting a lay man, especially so an ailing patient, to understand the medical jargon and decide the competency of their doctors can cause many unnecessary problems both to the patient as well as to the doctor administering treatment.
A common man with no medical background would not be able to comprehend the finer details that come with the afflictions and and how they cause wide variations in treatments from one individual to the next. In case of critical ailments, especially those with low rate of survival, a doctor who has achieved a survival rate of 5% may be hailed as a genius in the medical profession but would offer little consolation to a patient on his death bed.
Further, access to a doctor's treatment records could cause anxiety, stress and dishearten a patient who does not possess the resources to receive treatment from a better doctor. An ailing patient may not be in the appropriate mental condition to make a suitable decision regarding his treatment.
Some may argue that patients have the right to know the competency of the doctor treating them and also about the exact details and odds of their recovery.access to a doctor's prior treatment records can however come in the way of patient doctor confidentiality of previous patients and have a deleterious effect on the trust of patients on doctors.
While access to the details of their illness, mode of treatment, odds of recovery and ability of the doctor seems to be an unquestionable right of every patient, various problems would invariably follow by letting a patient be a judge of their doctor's competence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a doctor' or simply 'doctors'?
Suggestion: a doctor; doctors
...r details, the access to information of a doctors record may seem like a basic right of a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ike a basic right of an ailing patient. however, using this information to decide the d...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...r, using this information to decide the doctors competency to treat a patient can somet...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Doctors
...trimental to the patient themselves. doctors are trained proffessionals, who have ac...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...nnecessary problems both to the patient as well as to the doctor administering treatment. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... details that come with the afflictions and and how they cause wide variations in treat...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
... his death bed. Further, access to a doctors treatment records could cause anxiety, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...on regarding his treatment. Some may argue that patients have the right to know th...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be a judge of their doctors competence.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, regarding, so, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07780979827 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95443728685 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492795389049 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6024774314 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.2 118.986275619 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.7 23.4991977007 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438431246964 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197688870959 0.0831039109588 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913414013533 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25912446134 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896535754917 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 14.1392134831 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.