All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In this ever evolving world, adults are increasingly becoming preoccupied with various responsibilities and obligations like - trying to stay uptodate with latest technological developements to stay pertinent to the current times, working for the companies to make the successful, etc. This dreprieves them time to spend with children. The prompt suggests that parents should oblige to spend time in their childeren's schools and I agree with the prompt for the following reasons.
Firstly, as stated above, there is a drastic decrease in the time parents spend with their children at home. This trend can be attributed to various reasons: everyone is in a rat race to either to make an impact on the society or to earn their bread and butter, increased stress in adults due to various deadlines stipulated by the voracious companies, and the like. Consequently, parents have to spend less time with their children to fulfill other responsibitites. This behaviour exacts a toll on the parent-child relationship to a great extent when children need them the most. However, if parents volunteer themselves to the schools of their children, it will benefit both the children and the parents in tantamounts. Children, seeing their parents more often than before, begins to develop affection towards their parents and thus improves the bond between parents and the children. The formation of this strong bond can boost the psychological behaviour of the children and aid them to lead a blissful childhood. On the other hand, parents get to see their children more often which can relieve the parents of immeasurable stress that they carry in their heads thus serving to alleviate the mental health of the parents. Hence, one can observe a symbiosis benefit if parents spend time in the schools of their children.
Secondly, humans tend to form ideologies about how to lead a life based on the experiences they face. They tend to apply the same tenets to their offsprings which could result in a discord between parents and the children. However, if the parents spend time the schools, they get to experience the changes that are taking place in their next generations. This witnessing can mould how parents think about their childrens lives and thus, serve to form new tenets for their children. This way, parents can see first hand what their next generations is doing right and what they are doing wrong. Accordingly, parents can guide children in the right direction in such a way that children actually listen to them. This is not just beneficial to the parents alone but to the society as whole. Thus, parents spending time at their children's schools can help build a better society.
However, some might argue that the teachers in the shcool are proficient enough to guide the children in the right direction and it is just a waste of time for parents to spend time at schools rather than working at offices. I think there is no one in this world that can replace the place of a parent. Hence, one may not explicitly see the benefit of parents at schools but there are unarguable intangible benefits due to such practice.
To recapitulate, it is benefical to both the parents and the children if parents volunteer at schools as it leads to form better bonds with children and boosts the mental health of both the children and the parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...igations like - trying to stay uptodate with latest technological developements to stay per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, i think, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2800.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 560.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68928254735 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430357142857 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.0 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9162320128 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252602040294 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929185761894 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492886384638 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154847561132 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490366942759 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.