All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is rightly said that a company is only as good as its employees. The better the employees work, the more motivated they are and the stronger the relationship of employees within the company determines the quality and efficiency with which a company operates. However, even in a well-oiled machine, it is evident that some modifications or betterment is expected in the course of time. For such purposes, companies, rightfully, tend to hire consultants in order to flush out the dirt and provide new oil.
In every company, employees are asked to fill out surveys and forms in order to provide insider feedback for management officials. Employees can list out grievances, certain requirements and modifications to protocol in these surveys. This kind of feedback is very necessary for a company to harvest from their employees. This helps the management team of the company to find out how the employees feel about certain policies, which policies are working in tandem with company vision and which policies are causing a disruption in operations.
However, in order to craft new policies, flush out older, outdated ones and to bring in new protocols, or in short, to improve the efficiency of the company, it is imperative to hire a professional consultant who can provide an ousider view of the current situation.
The sole responsibility of consultants is to provide a fresh perspective. A consultant carries out deep research and analysis of company operations, policies and protocols and provides feedback. In the process, flaws are recognised, wrongdoings on various levels of company heirarchy are exposed and many shortcomings of company operations can be found out. This kind of negative feedback can be helpul in eradicating malpractices and outdated models of practice. It may also throw light upon the policies and protocols that are doing well and should be enhanced.
If this responsibility is given to the employees of the company, it may lead to anarchy as every employee will have his/her own grievances, specific requirements, etc. Employees can only see the working of their own company but a consultant can provide comparison with competitors. This kind of input can be extremely helpful in doing better not only in comparison with self but also other competitors in the market. Moreover, it also distrcats employees from focusing on their own work.
Employees are the ones that make up the company in terms of efficiency. Howe efficient employees are, the same can be said for the company. Consultants can provide information on employee work ethics which may lead to cuts of employees. Employees themselves will never be able to give that kind of feedback.
Companies hire ocnsultants usually when they are in trouble or when they need to perform better than competitors. However, it is good practice to have a ocnsultant on board at all times in order to keep the ship from the rocky shores and the oceanbed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 152, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s. However, it is good practice to have a ocnsultant on board at all times in ord...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, in short, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17047817048 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97080595026 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6734999494 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0416666667 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251805130091 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792786124533 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546548656915 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129520194329 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564545348416 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.