All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The issue here suggests that a company instead of hiring outside consultants should listen to their own employees and not take the consultancy of outsiders. I strongly feel that this statement is the perfect way for a company to prosper in terms of market value and rise above the other competition.
Firstly, the consultancy firms are multi-national companies which help to set up their clients in the market well above their competitors. But, these companies take huge lumpsums of money from their clients and milk them out of their cash whereas, they could have used it some place else which might have proved to be more fruitful. Instead, the companies can invest this money on internal training to better cope up in the technological scene. They can train some people in hotskills that are booming currently, even they can train people to be consultants which might lower their external expenditure.
Secondly, the most important factor which a company has is time. Time is of the pure essence and should be used in the most well planned way. The companies which hire external consultants need a lot of time for their consultants to set up in the working environment they already have. Because, the infrastructure setup will help them to gain an upper edge in the market.
Lastly, the one indisposable component of the company is it's workforce. May it be a senior with atleast 10 years of experience, or a fresher who has been working there for one or two years these are the people that the company should actually be taking advice from. Because, being in the market and working for the firm has made them better understand the current situation of the company. Also, they know the ins and outs of the organization making them the perfect assessors in times of turmoil the company is facing, by pin-pointing to the exact weak links and the unnecessary resource consumption.
Though a counterpoint would be that these external consultancy firms have been specializing on these skill, implementing their client's strengths and weaknesses to help them turn a tide. But all in all the companies would certainly gain much more by listening to their own employees who have been in the company and know how that particular company works more than any outsider.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 75
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 16
- In the Carlton County the incidences of vandalism has been increasing over the past two years and at the same time there has also been dramatic increase in out of state migrants So we should ban all the immigrants moving in the city in order to stop vanda 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... working environment they already have. Because, the infrastructure setup will help the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this skill' or 'these skills'?
Suggestion: this skill; these skills
...ultancy firms have been specializing on these skill, implementing their clients strengths a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92408376963 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73019581522 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502617801047 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5463059087 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5625 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418233870629 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140673522441 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106905716929 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257058355268 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779379502213 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.