All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The assertion that it is necessary to hire consultant for the companies is a controversial issue. Some people believe that it is necessary to hire such consultants in order to suggest ways to improve efficiency whereas others think that employees of the company can give useful feedback and companies do not need consultants. I think listening to the employee is useful but can not substitute with consultants because of the reasons which are elucidated below.
First of all, the suggestions of employees can play an important role in finding ways to operate companies more efficiently because employees are completely aware of various aspects of the operation and can give a beneficial suggestion. For instance, assume a company that produces food products and managers want to handle the company in a more efficient way. In this scenario, employees who work in the company, for example, workers, are fully aware of the weak points of the company. If the managers spend more time listening to the workers, then they can find problems in the production line and find ways to solve the problems.
On the other hand, there are some problems that employees are not aware of them or they can not suggest any way to increase the efficiency of the company. In this situation, managers should hire expert consultants to evaluate the efficiency of the operations and suggest ways to improve efficiency. For example, In a high-tech company that produces heavy engineering equipment, workers do not know anything about the ways to improve the efficiency of the operation because they do not have any expertise in industrial engineering. So managers should hire a consultant to find the problems in the company and managers can implement their suggestions to gain more profit.
Moreover, there are some cases in which managers of a company can not hire outside consultants because they produce some sort of sensitive products and do not want to divulge the procedure of the production. In such cases like producing weapons or army tools, authorities should receive consultation from the employees inside the company who can help managers to improve efficiency. However, it is hard to find such a consultant inside the company, and managers should get limited advice from outside consultants in order to maximize the production of the company.
To sum it all, I think whether hiring a consultant or not mostly dependant on the type of the company and the level of the complexity of the production. If the employees can give beneficial advice, then hiring consultants in useless. But in general, we can not only depend on the employees to find ways to operate more efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...ether hiring a consultant or not mostly dependant on the type of the company and the leve...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in general, sort of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08409090909 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86911362907 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397727272727 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3479394136 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.588235294 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8823529412 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404971682217 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159185998901 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640488804906 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261997154399 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425192097776 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.